Literature DB >> 16434066

Bias in magnitude estimation following left hemisphere injury.

Adam J Woods1, Mark Mennemeier, Edgar Garcia-Rill, Jay Meythaler, Victor W Mark, George R Jewel, Heather Murphy.   

Abstract

There is a growing interest both in identifying the neural mechanisms of magnitude estimation and in identifying forms of bias that can explain aspects of behavioral syndromes like unilateral neglect. Magnitude estimation is associated with activation of temporo-parietal cortex in both cerebral hemispheres of normal subjects; however, it is unclear if and how left hemisphere lesions bias magnitude estimation because the infrequency of neglect and the presence of aphasia in these subjects confound examination. In contrast, we examined magnitude estimation using 12 different types of sensory stimuli that spanned five sensory domains in two patients with very different clinical presentations following unilateral left hemisphere stroke. One patient had neglect sub-acutely without aphasia. The other had aphasia chronically after a temporo-parietal lesion but not neglect. The neglect patient was re-examined 48 h after being treated with modafinil (Provigil) for decreased arousal. Both patients demonstrated bias in magnitude estimation relative to normal subjects (n=83). Alertness improved in the neglect patient after taking modafinil. His neglect also resolved and his magnitude estimates more closely resembled those of normal subjects. This is the first evidence, to our knowledge, that left hemisphere injury can bias magnitude estimation in a manner similar but not identical to that associated with right hemisphere injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16434066      PMCID: PMC4420160          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  21 in total

Review 1.  Do we need the "lateral" in unilateral neglect? Spatially nonselective attention deficits in unilateral neglect and their implications for rehabilitation.

Authors:  I H Robertson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The influence of stimulus properties on visual neglect.

Authors:  R Tegnér; M Levander
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  The cross-over effect in unilateral neglect. Modelling detailed data in the line-bisection task.

Authors:  P Monaghan; R Shillcock
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  The neuronal basis for consciousness.

Authors:  R Llinás; U Ribary; D Contreras; C Pedroarena
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Reduction in cerebral activation after right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  H B Coslett; D Bowers; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Weigh(t)ing for awareness.

Authors:  A Chatterjee; K A Thompson
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.310

8.  The psychophysical power law and unilateral spatial neglect.

Authors:  A Chatterjee; M Mennemeier; K M Heilman
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.310

9.  A stimulus-response relationship in unilateral neglect: the power function.

Authors:  A Chatterjee; M Mennemeier; K M Heilman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes.

Authors:  Domenica Bueti; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Improvement in arousal, visual neglect, and perception of stimulus intensity following cold pressor stimulation.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Mark Mennemeier; Edgar Garcia-Rill; Tiffany Huitt; Kenneth C Chelette; Gary McCullough; Tiffany Munn; Ginger Brown; Thomas S Kiser
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 0.881

3.  Long-term deficits of preterm birth: evidence for arousal and attentional disturbances.

Authors:  R Whit Hall; Tiffany Wallace Huitt; Richa Thapa; D Keith Williams; K J S Anand; Edgar Garcia-Rill
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Arousal and the control of perception and movement.

Authors:  E Garcia-Rill; T Virmani; J R Hyde; S D'Onofrio; S Mahaffey
Journal:  Curr Trends Neurol       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Chapter 11--novel mechanism for hyperreflexia and spasticity.

Authors:  C Yates; K Garrison; N B Reese; A Charlesworth; E Garcia-Rill
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 6.  Rose-colored answers: neuropsychological deficits and patient-reported outcomes after stroke.

Authors:  Anna M Barrett
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.342

7.  Rehabilitation of spatial neglect.

Authors:  Alonso R Riestra; A M Barrett
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

8.  Distractor removal amplifies spatial frequency-specific crossover of the attentional bias: a psychophysical and Monte Carlo simulation study.

Authors:  Jiaqing Chen; Matthias Niemeier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  rTMS over the intraparietal sulcus disrupts numerosity processing.

Authors:  Marinella Cappelletti; Hilary Barth; Felipe Fregni; Elizabeth S Spelke; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Hyper-arousal decreases human visual thresholds.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; John W Philbeck; Philip Wirtz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.