Literature DB >> 17445805

Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States.

Judy E Stern1, Marcelle I Cedars, Tarun Jain, Nancy A Klein, C Martin Beaird, David A Grainger, William E Gibbons.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: [1] To evaluate trends in number of embryos transferred and resultant high-order multiple (HOM) pregnancy rates by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART)-member clinics between 1996 and 2003 and [2] to relate these practice patterns and outcomes to clinic compliance with SART-American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) embryo transfer guidelines.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology-member fertility centers in the United States. PATIENT(S): Five hundred thirty-six thousand, five hundred twenty-four fresh, nondonor IVF cycles. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of embryos transferred; pregnancy rates; implantation rates; and proportion of singleton, twin, and HOM pregnancies. RESULT(S): The number of embryos transferred declined each year. High-order multiple pregnancy rates also declined, whereas the twin rates remained stable. The most pronounced declines in number transferred occurred immediately after publication of SART-ASRM embryo transfer guidelines. After stratifying clinics according to mean and modal number of embryos transferred, clinics transferring the fewest embryos in women <35 years of age had the highest mean implantation and pregnancy rates. Furthermore, the percentage of clinics transferring two embryos to a majority of women <35 years of age increased from 3.3% in 1996 to 49.9% in 2003. CONCLUSION(S): The implementation of SART-ASRM embryo transfer guidelines is associated with significant reductions in the number of embryos being transferred, along with reductions of HOM pregnancies. Initiatives to further reduce twin pregnancies and encourage singleton gestation outcomes are outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17445805     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  18 in total

Review 1.  "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.

Authors:  Pamela M White
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention.

Authors:  Dmitry M Kissin; Aniket D Kulkarni; Allison Mneimneh; Lee Warner; Sheree L Boulet; Sara Crawford; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Trends and correlates of good perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Nikhil Joshi; Dmitry Kissin; John E Anderson; Donna Session; Maurizio Macaluso; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Association between assisted reproductive technology conception and autism in California, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Christine Fountain; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin; Laura A Schieve; Denise J Jamieson; Catherine Rice; Peter Bearman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Mark D Hornstein; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  SMFM Special Statement: State of the science on multifetal gestations: unique considerations and importance.

Authors:  Katherine L Grantz; Tetsuya Kawakita; Ya-Ling Lu; Roger Newman; Vincenzo Berghella; Aaron Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome--United States, 1999 to 2010.

Authors:  Marissa L Steinberg; Sheree Boulet; Dmitry Kissin; Lee Warner; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  A prediction model for live birth and multiple births within the first three cycles of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; G David Ball
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Establishment of trophectoderm and inner cell mass lineages in the mouse embryo.

Authors:  Yusuke Marikawa; Vernadeth B Alarcón
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.