Literature DB >> 25637480

Embryo transfer practices and multiple births resulting from assisted reproductive technology: an opportunity for prevention.

Dmitry M Kissin1, Aniket D Kulkarni2, Allison Mneimneh2, Lee Warner2, Sheree L Boulet2, Sara Crawford2, Denise J Jamieson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate assisted reproductive technology (ART) ET practices in the United States and assess the impact of these practices on multiple births, which pose health risks for both mothers and infants.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis using the National ART Surveillance System data.
SETTING: US fertility centers reporting to the National ART Surveillance System. PATIENT(S): Noncanceled ART cycles conducted in the United States in 2012. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Multiple birth (birth of two or more infants, at least one of whom was live-born). RESULT(S): Of 134,381 ART transfer cycles performed in 2012, 51,262 resulted in live births, of which 13,563 (26.5%) were multiple births: 13,123 twin and 440 triplet and higher order births. Almost half (46.1%) of these multiple births resulted from the following four cycle types: two fresh blastocyst transfers among favorable or average prognosis patients less than 35 years (1,931 and 1,341 multiple births, respectively), two fresh blastocyst transfers among donor-oocyte recipients (1,532 multiple births), and two frozen/thawed ETs among patients less than 35 years (1,452 multiple births). More than half of triplet or higher order births resulted from the transfer of two embryos (52.5% of births among fresh autologous transfers, 67.2% of births among donor-oocyte recipient transfers, and 42.9% among frozen/thawed autologous transfers). CONCLUSION(S): A substantial reduction of ART-related multiple (both twin and triplet or higher order) births in the United States could be achieved by single blastocyst transfers among favorable and average prognosis patients less than 35 years of age and donor-oocyte recipients. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive technology (ART); embryo transfer guidelines; in vitro fertilization (IVF); multiple birth

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25637480      PMCID: PMC4607049          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  29 in total

Review 1.  Elective single-embryo transfer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 2.  The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Vitthala; T A Gelbaya; D R Brison; C T Fitzgerald; L G Nardo
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Guidelines on number of embryos transferred.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Guidelines on number of embryos transferred.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Public reporting of clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs: implications for other medical and surgical procedures.

Authors:  Eli Y Adashi; Ron Wyden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Criteria for number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Is cryopreservation of embryos a legitimate surrogate marker of embryo quality in studies of assisted reproductive technology conducted using national databases?

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Ellice S Lieberman; Maurizio Macaluso; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia.

Authors:  Georgina M Chambers; Peter J Illingworth; Elizabeth A Sullivan
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Three decades of twin births in the United States, 1980-2009.

Authors:  Joyce A Martin; Brady E Hamilton; Michelle J K Osterman
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2012-01

10.  Elective single embryo transfer trends and predictors of a good perinatal outcome--United States, 1999 to 2010.

Authors:  Marissa L Steinberg; Sheree Boulet; Dmitry Kissin; Lee Warner; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.

Authors:  Pamela M White
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Oxygen tension in embryo culture: does a shift to 2% O2 in extended culture represent the most physiologic system?

Authors:  Scott J Morin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Factors predicting double embryo implantation following double embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology: implications for elective single embryo transfer.

Authors:  Caitlin Martin; Jeani Chang; Sheree Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Dmitry Kissin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  No advantage of fresh blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer in women under the age of 39: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Federico Cirillo; Antonella Smeraldi; Emanuela Morenghi; Giulia E G Mulazzani; Elena Albani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The Influence of Delayed Blastocyst Development on the Outcome of Frozen-Thawed Transfer of Euploid and Untested Embryos.

Authors:  Parnita Sardana; Jwal Banker; Reena Gupta; Aditi Kotdawala; P G L Lalitkumar; Manish Banker
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-07-09

6.  Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Sheree L Boulet; Allison S Mneimneh; Kiran M Perkins; Denise J Jamieson; Yujia Zhang; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Dmitry M Kissin; Sara B Crawford; Suzanne G Folger; Sheree L Boulet; Lee Warner; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2018-02-16

Review 8.  Limitations and opportunities in male fertility databases.

Authors:  Brent M Hanson; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07

9.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Dmitry M Kissin; Sara B Crawford; Suzanne G Folger; Denise J Jamieson; Lee Warner; Wanda D Barfield
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 10.  Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tamara Tobias; Fady I Sharara; Jason M Franasiak; Patrick W Heiser; Emily Pinckney-Clark
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2016-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.