Literature DB >> 17445659

Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy.

Ashutosh K Tewari1, Kevin Bigelow, Sandhya Rao, Atsushi Takenaka, Nasr El-Tabi, Alex Te, E D Vaughan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The puboprostatic ligaments, puboperinealis muscle, and arcus tendineus are all recognized as important for continence in men and women. This complex of ligaments, muscles, and tendineus aponeurosis acts in unison to provide continence and can be disrupted during robotic prostatectomy. We propose that preservation of the puboprostatic collar during robotic surgery will help to restore early continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy.
METHODS: We performed cadaveric studies in 10 fresh cadavers to devise strategies to leave intact the puboprostatic ligaments, muscular collar, and arcus tendineus supporting the continence mechanism. We developed reconstructive strategies to reconnect the ligaments to the urethrovesical anastomosis, reapproximated the muscles, and fixed the distal bladder to the arcus tendineus. These modifications were then attempted in 50 consecutive patients who underwent robotic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The patient-reported outcomes were then used to assess the efficacy of this procedure.
RESULTS: The technique was reproducible, and the average additional time taken for the final reconstruction was only 2 to 5 minutes. The continence rate was 29% in the first week, 62% at 6 weeks, 88% at 12 weeks, and 95% in 16 weeks after catheter removal. No other differences were found in the operative, oncologic, or perioperative outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: This modification helped in the early return of continence. It is unlikely that the long-term results will be any different, but shortening the recovery time will have psychological, financial, and health-related quality-of-life benefits for the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17445659     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  33 in total

1.  Laparoscopic "single knot-single running" suture vesico-urethral anastomosis with posterior musculofascial reconstruction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Simone; Rocco Papalia; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Salvatore Guaglianone; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care.

Authors:  Gencay Hatiboglu; Dogu Teber; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  The current status of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Prokar Dasgupta; Roger S Kirby
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in Greece: the learning curve and beyond. The initial 40 cases.

Authors:  N P Pardalidis; N A Andriopoulos; A Tsiga; N Giannakou; E Kosmaoglou
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-06-17

5.  Simple method to predict return of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Douglas Skarecky; Blanca Morales; Alexandra Chang; Thomas Ahlering
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  [Robotics and intraoperative navigation].

Authors:  D S Schoeb; J Rassweiler; A Sigle; A Miernik; C Engels; A S Goezen; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Effect of dorsal vascular complex size on the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Jong Jin Oh; Seong Jin Jeong; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sung Il Hwang; Hak Jong Lee; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Luca Topazio; Michele De Angelis; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Andrea Fuschi; Filippo Annino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of continence recovery between robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Seung Jun Son; Sang Chul Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Seong Jin Jeong; Seok Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-09-10

10.  Advances in robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; Matthew T Gettman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.