Literature DB >> 18765121

Advances in robotic prostatectomy.

Stephen A Boorjian1, Matthew T Gettman.   

Abstract

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has emerged as an important treatment option for localized prostate cancer. As such, methods to improve instrumentation, technique, outcomes, and cost require continued investigation. For example, a recently introduced four-armed robotic system has limited the need for bedside assistants, while an enhanced understanding of pelvic anatomy as visualized robotically has led to valuable modifications in operative technique. Increased surgeon experience has decreased perioperative morbidity, and has resulted in short-term pathologic and functional outcomes that compare favorably with open radical prostatectomy. Meanwhile, quality-of-life studies using validated instruments are helping to define the time course of patient recovery. Nevertheless, costs associated with robotic surgery remain daunting. As the follow-up of patients treated with RALP matures, future studies, ideally with a prospective, randomized design, will be needed to establish the long-term oncologic efficacy of the procedure and to evaluate the overall advantages of RALP compared with open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18765121     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-008-0043-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  39 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; David Woo; Louis Eichel; David I Lee; Robert Edwards; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; James O Peabody; Alok Shrivastava; Sanjeev Kaul; Akshay Bhandari; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  Laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: what are the real advantages?

Authors:  S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  David P Wood; Ryan Schulte; Rodney L Dunn; Brent K Hollenbeck; Richard Saur; J Stuart Wolf; James E Montie
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome.

Authors:  John F Ward; Jeffrey M Slezak; Michael L Blute; Erik J Bergstralh; Horst Zincke
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective assessment of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Todd M Webster; S Duke Herrell; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; Roxelyn G Baumgartner; Laura W Anderson; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  J T Wei; R L Dunn; M S Litwin; H M Sandler; M G Sanda
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Perioperative complications of laparoscopic and robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Rebecca A Nelson; Timothy G Wilson; Mark H Kawachi; S Adam Ramin; Clayton Lau; Laura E Crocitto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Multi-institutional study of symptomatic deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in prostate cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Fernando P Secin; Thomas Jiborn; Anders S Bjartell; Georges Fournier; Laurent Salomon; Clément Claude Abbou; George P Haber; Inderbir S Gill; Laura E Crocitto; Rebecca A Nelson; José R Cansino Alcaide; Luis Martínez-Piñeiro; Michael S Cohen; Ingolf Tuerk; Claude Schulman; Troy Gianduzzo; Christopher Eden; Roxelyn Baumgartner; Joseph A Smith; Kim Entezari; Roland van Velthoven; Gunter Janetschek; Angel M Serio; Andrew J Vickers; Karim Touijer; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Adoption of new technology and healthcare quality: surgical margins after robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Alon Z Weizer; Zaojun Ye; John M Hollingsworth; Rodney L Dunn; Rajal B Shah; J Stuart Wolf; John T Wei; James E Montie; Brent K Hollenbeck
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prospective comparison of the impact of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical prostatectomy on health-related quality of life and decision regret.

Authors:  B Joyce Davison; Andrew Matthew; Abbie M Gardner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Overcoming drug resistance and treating advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Julius Semenas; Cinzia Allegrucci; Stephen A Boorjian; Nigel P Mongan; Jenny Liao Persson
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.465

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.