Literature DB >> 27637504

Robotic radical prostatectomy in Greece: the learning curve and beyond. The initial 40 cases.

N P Pardalidis1,2, N A Andriopoulos3, A Tsiga3, N Giannakou3, E Kosmaoglou3.   

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy is the treatment of choice for management of organ-confined prostate cancer. Minimally invasive treatments, as an alternative, have refined been recently by the introduction of da Vinci robotic technology which has the potential to improve surgical outcomes and reduce the steep learning curve associated with conventional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We report on our experience with robotic radical prostatectomy using the first da Vinci robotic system in our country. During 8 months, 40 robotic radical prostatectomies were performed by a single surgical team at Athens Medical Centre (Marousi, Greece). Preoperative data collection included basic demographics, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and Gleason score. Operative outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications. Postoperative outcomes included hospital stay, pain, catheter time, pathology, PSA, return of continence, and potency. Average operative time was 186.25 min with an estimated mean blood loss of 135 ml. There were no intra-operative complications. Ninety per cent of the patients were discharged home on postoperative day 1 with mean haematocrit 36.7 (range 29-43). All patients reported minimal postoperative pain and resumed regular diet on the first postoperative day. Average catheter time was 6.6 days (range 5-10). Early continence was observed in 47.5% of the patients, seven days after catheter removal. Continence at 1, 3, and 6 months was 75, 82.5 and 95%, respectively. The overall positive margin rate was 17.5%. Ninety-five per cent of the patients had undetectable postoperative PSA levels (less than 0.1 ng/ml) at a median follow-up of 6 months. Our initial experience with robotic radical prostatectomy is very promising. The learning curve was approximately 10-12 cases. With a methodical approach we were able to implement the method safely and effectively in our practice, combining minimal morbidity with good oncological and functional outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continence; Potency; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Robotics

Year:  2008        PMID: 27637504     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-008-0092-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  23 in total

1.  An operative and anatomic study to help in nerve sparing during laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ashutosh Tewari; James O Peabody; Melissa Fischer; Richard Sarle; Guy Vallancien; V Delmas; Mazen Hassan; Aditya Bansal; Ashok K Hemal; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; David Woo; Louis Eichel; David I Lee; Robert Edwards; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari; James O Peabody; Alok Shrivastava; Sanjeev Kaul; Akshay Bhandari; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 4.  Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Stefano Cavalleri; Giacomo Novara; Maurizio Aragona; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Karolinska prostatectomy: a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique.

Authors:  Andreas E Nilsson; Stefan Carlsson; Brett A Laven; N Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006

Review 6.  [Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes].

Authors:  Geoff Coughlin; Kenneth J Palmer; Ketul Shah; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  Arch Esp Urol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.436

Review 7.  Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Geoffrey N Box; Thomas E Ahlering
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.309

8.  Preservation of the puboprostatic collar and puboperineoplasty for early recovery of urinary continence after robotic prostatectomy: anatomic basis and preliminary outcomes.

Authors:  Atsushi Takenaka; Ashutosh K Tewari; Robert A Leung; Kevin Bigelow; Nasr El-Tabey; Gen Murakami; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Early continence recovery after open radical prostatectomy with restoration of the posterior aspect of the rhabdosphincter.

Authors:  Francesco Rocco; Luca Carmignani; Pietro Acquati; Franco Gadda; Paolo Dell'Orto; Bernardo Rocco; Stefano Casellato; Giacomo Gazzano; Dario Consonni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Robotic radical prostatectomy and the Vattikuti Urology Institute technique: an interim analysis of results and technical points.

Authors:  Mani Menon; Ashutosh Tewari
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.