Literature DB >> 17443960

No evidence of inbreeding avoidance in a polygynous ungulate: the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus).

Oystein Holand1, Kjartan R Askim, Knut H Røed, Robert B Weladji, Hallvard Gjøstein, Mauri Nieminen.   

Abstract

In polygynous species, mate choice is an integrated part of sexual selection. However, whether mate choice occurs independently of the genetic relatedness among mating pairs has received little attention, although inbreeding may have fitness consequences. We studied whether genetic relatedness influenced females' choice of partner in a highly polygynous ungulate--the reindeer (Rangifer tarandus)--in an experimental herd during two consecutive rutting seasons; the herd consisting of 75 females in 1999 and 74 females in 2000 was exposed to three 4.5-year-old adults and three 1.5-year-old young males, respectively. The females' distribution during peak rut was not influenced by their genetic relatedness with the dominant males of the mating groups. Further, genetic relatedness did not influence the actual choice of mating partner. We conclude that inbreeding avoidance through mating group choice as well as choice of mating partner, two interconnected processes of female mate choice operating at two different scales in space and time, in such a highly female-biased reindeer populations with low level of inbreeding may not occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17443960      PMCID: PMC2373823          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

1.  Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers.

Authors:  M Lynch; K Ritland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Inbreeding avoidance in animals.

Authors:  A Pusey; M Wolf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  The effects of habitat fragmentation on the social kin structure and mating system of the agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis.

Authors:  S C Banks; S J Ward; D B Lindenmayer; G R Finlayson; S J Lawson; A C Taylor
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 4.  Mammalian mating systems.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1989-05-22

Review 5.  How is female mate choice affected by male competition?

Authors:  Bob B M Wong; Ulrika Candolin
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-11

6.  Reproductive success in reindeer males in a herd with varying sex ratio.

Authors:  Knut H Røed; Øystein Holand; Martin E Smith; Hallvard Gjøstein; Jouko Kumpula; Mauri Nieminen
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Inbreeding avoidance in cunningham's skinks (Egernia cunninghami) in natural and fragmented habitat.

Authors:  A J Stow; P Sunnucks
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Timing and synchrony of ovulation in red deer constrained by short northern summers.

Authors:  Rolf Langvatn; Atle Mysterud; Nils C Stenseth; Nigel G Yoccoz
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 3.926

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  Cross-Species Application of SNP Chips is Not Suitable for Identifying Runs of Homozygosity.

Authors:  Aaron B A Shafer; Joshua M Miller; Marty Kardos
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Response to "Cross-Species Application of SNP Chips is Not Suitable for Identifying Runs of Homozygosity" by Shafer, Miller, and Kardos.

Authors:  Veronika Kharzinova; Alexander A Sermyagin; Elena A Gladyr; Gottfried Brem; Natalia A Zinovieva
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in a wild primate.

Authors:  Allison A Galezo; Melina A Nolas; Arielle S Fogel; Raphael S Mututua; J Kinyua Warutere; I Long'ida Siodi; Jeanne Altmann; Elizabeth A Archie; Jenny Tung; Susan C Alberts
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Microsatellite support for active inbreeding in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  Kathrin Langen; Julia Schwarzer; Harald Kullmann; Theo C M Bakker; Timo Thünken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  What happens after inbreeding avoidance? Inbreeding by rejected relatives and the inclusive fitness benefit of inbreeding avoidance.

Authors:  A Bradley Duthie; Jane M Reid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Re-mating across years and intralineage polygyny are associated with greater than expected levels of inbreeding in wild red deer.

Authors:  K V Stopher; D H Nussey; T H Clutton-Brock; F Guinness; A Morris; J M Pemberton
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Incestuous sisters: mate preference for brothers over unrelated males in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Adeline Loyau; Jérémie H Cornuau; Jean Clobert; Etienne Danchin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.