Literature DB >> 17442455

Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust.

Michael Siegrist1, Marie-Eve Cousin, Hans Kastenholz, Arnim Wiek.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology is increasingly being employed in the areas of food production and packaging. Public perception will be crucial to the realization of these technological advances. We examined how lay people (N=153) perceive nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging, and we examined the factors that influence willingness to buy these products. Participants received some general information about nanotechnology, and specific information about four nanotechnology applications. Overall, participants were hesitant to buy nanotechnology foods or food with nanotechnology packaging. Results suggest, however, that nanotechnology packaging is perceived as being more beneficial than nanotechnology foods. Results further suggest that social trust in the food industry is an important factor directly influencing the affect evoked by these new products. As suggested by the affect heuristic, affect had an impact on perceived benefits and perceived risks. Perceived benefit seems to be the most important predictor for willingness to buy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17442455     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  20 in total

1.  The communication challenges presented by nanofoods.

Authors:  Timothy V Duncan
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Avoiding empty rhetoric: engaging publics in debates about nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Renee Kyle; Susan Dodds
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: a case study in Southwest Iran.

Authors:  Sedigheh Ghasemi; Ezatollah Karami; Hossein Azadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Factors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysis.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Arnout R H Fischer; Ivo A van der Lans; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Corley; Dietram A Scheufele; Qian Hu
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.253

6.  Ethics, Risk and Benefits Associated with Different Applications of Nanotechnology: a Comparison of Expert and Consumer Perceptions of Drivers of Societal Acceptance.

Authors:  N Gupta; A R H Fischer; L J Frewer
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 0.917

7.  Effects of disciplinary cultures of researchers and research trainees on the acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Vanessa Chenel; Patrick Boissy; Jean-Pierre Cloarec; Johane Patenaude
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  The acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: perceptions of researchers and research trainees in the field of new technologies.

Authors:  Vanessa Chenel; Patrick Boissy; Marie-Sol Poirier; Jean-Pierre Cloarec; Johane Patenaude
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-03-16

9.  Nanotechnology in meat processing and packaging: potential applications - a review.

Authors:  Karna Ramachandraiah; Sung Gu Han; Koo Bok Chin
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.509

10.  Consumer acceptance of and willingness to pay for food nanotechnology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Emma L Giles; Sharron Kuznesof; Beth Clark; Carmen Hubbard; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.