Literature DB >> 19885072

Teaching evaluation practices in colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Candace W Barnett1, Hewitt W Matthews.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document teaching evaluation practices in colleges and schools of pharmacy.
METHODS: A 51-item questionnaire was developed based on the instrument used in a previous study with modifications made to address changes in pharmacy education. An online survey service was used to distribute the electronic questionnaire to the deans of 98 colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States.
RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 89 colleges and schools of pharmacy. All colleges/schools administered student evaluations of classroom and experiential teaching. Faculty peer evaluation of classroom teaching was used by 66% of colleges/schools. Use of other evaluation methods had increased over the previous decade, including use of formalized self-appraisal of teaching, review of teaching portfolios, interviews with samples of students, and review by teaching experts. While the majority (55%) of colleges/schools administered classroom teaching evaluations at or near the conclusion of a course, 38% administered them at the midpoint and/or conclusion of a faculty member's teaching within a team-taught course. Completion of an online evaluation form was the most common method used for evaluation of classroom (54%) and experiential teaching (72%).
CONCLUSION: Teaching evaluation methods used in colleges and schools of pharmacy expanded from 1996 to 2007 to include more evaluation of experiential teaching, review by peers, formalized self-appraisal of teaching, review of teaching portfolios, interviews with samples of students, review by teaching experts, and evaluation by alumni. Procedures for conducting student evaluations of teaching have adapted to address changes in curriculum delivery and technology.

Keywords:  assessment; evaluation; survey; teaching

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19885072      PMCID: PMC2769525          DOI: 10.5688/aj7306103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  3 in total

1.  The planning and implementation of a faculty peer review teaching project.

Authors:  Karen K Schultz; David Latif
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Evaluation of an evidence-based peer teaching assessment program.

Authors:  Laura B Hansen; Marianne McCollum; Susan M Paulsen; Thomas Cyr; Catherine L Jarvis; Glenda Tate; Ralph J Altiere
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Pharmacy students' perceptions of a teaching evaluation process.

Authors:  Christopher K Surratt; Shane P Desselle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.047

  3 in total
  15 in total

1.  A Reflection of Faculty and Course Evaluations.

Authors:  Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  A Review of Strategies for Designing, Administering, and Using Student Ratings of Instruction.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; W Thomas Smith; Srikanth Kolluru; Elizabeth A Sheaffer; Margarita DiVall
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Evaluation of a Teaching Assistant Program for Third-Year Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  Courtney L Bradley; Julia Khanova; Kelly L Scolaro
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Assessment of full-time faculty preceptors by colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States and Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Harold L Kirschenbaum; Tina Zerilli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Factors that influence student completion of course and faculty evaluations.

Authors:  Catherine L Hatfield; Elizabeth A Coyle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Processes and Metrics to Evaluate Faculty Practice Activities at US Schools of Pharmacy.

Authors:  Stuart T Haines; Brigitte L Sicat; Seena L Haines; Eric J MacLaughlin; Jenny A Van Amburgh
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  A Faculty Toolkit for Formative Assessment in Pharmacy Education.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Greg L Alston; Eleanora Bird; Shauna M Buring; Katherine A Kelley; Nanci L Murphy; Lauren S Schlesselman; Cindy D Stowe; Julianna E Szilagyi
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Teaching Scholar Resolutions for 2018.

Authors:  Lauren Schlesselman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Changes to the Student Evaluation of Teaching Process.

Authors:  Vasudha Gupta; Velliyur Viswesh; Catherine Cone; Elizabeth Unni
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Impact and Attitudes about Peer Review of Teaching in a Canadian Pharmacy School.

Authors:  Cynthia L Richard; Elaine Lillie; Kaitlin Mathias; Thomas McFarlane
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.