Literature DB >> 17428774

Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice.

Rafal Bogacz1, Marius Usher, Jiaxiang Zhang, James L McClelland.   

Abstract

The leaky competing accumulator (LCA) is a biologically inspired model of choice. It describes the processes of leaky accumulation and competition observed in neuronal populations during choice tasks and it accounts for reaction time distributions observed in psychophysical experiments. This paper discusses recent analyses and extensions of the LCA model. First, it reviews the dynamics and examines the conditions that make the model achieve optimal performance. Second, it shows that nonlinearities of the type present in biological neurons improve performance when the number of choice alternatives increases. Third, the model is extended to value-based choice, where it is shown that nonlinearities in the value function explain risk aversion in risky choice and preference reversals in choice between alternatives characterized across multiple dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17428774      PMCID: PMC2440778          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  29 in total

Review 1.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting.

Authors:  J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model.

Authors:  M Usher; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Neuromodulation of decision and response selection.

Authors:  Marius Usher; Eddy J Davelaar
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul

4.  Matching behavior and the representation of value in the parietal cortex.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.

Authors:  Marius Usher; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Contrast effects or loss aversion? Comment on Usher and McClelland (2004).

Authors:  Jerome R Busemeyer; James T Townsend; Adele Diederich; Rachel Barkan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 7.  Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making.

Authors:  Leo P Sugrue; Greg S Corrado; William T Newsome
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Kevin Gurney
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.026

9.  Laws of visual choice reaction time.

Authors:  W H Teichner; M J Krebs
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  M N Shadlen; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  66 in total

1.  Neural inhibition enables selection during language processing.

Authors:  Hannah R Snyder; Natalie Hutchison; Erika Nyhus; Tim Curran; Marie T Banich; Randall C O'Reilly; Yuko Munakata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Selection of wrist posture in conditions of motor ambiguity.

Authors:  Daniel K Wood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Introduction. Modelling natural action selection.

Authors:  Tony J Prescott; Joanna J Bryson; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis.

Authors:  Paul Cisek
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Biologically constrained action selection improves cognitive control in a model of the Stroop task.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  The encoding of alternatives in multiple-choice decision making.

Authors:  Larissa Albantakis; Gustavo Deco
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  On optimal decision-making in brains and social insect colonies.

Authors:  James A R Marshall; Rafal Bogacz; Anna Dornhaus; Robert Planqué; Tim Kovacs; Nigel R Franks
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 8.  Decision making in recurrent neuronal circuits.

Authors:  Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall.

Authors:  Per B Sederberg; Marc W Howard; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.