Literature DB >> 15631596

Contrast effects or loss aversion? Comment on Usher and McClelland (2004).

Jerome R Busemeyer1, James T Townsend, Adele Diederich, Rachel Barkan.   

Abstract

M. Usher and J. L. McClelland (2004) recently proposed a new connectionist type of model to explain context effects on preferential choice including the similarity, attraction, and compromise effects. They compared their model with an earlier connectionist type model for these same effects proposed by R. Roe, J. R. Busemeyer, and J. T. Townsend (2001) and raised several new issues. The authors address these issues and point out the main theoretical differences between the 2 explanations for context effects.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15631596     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  2 in total

1.  Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Marius Usher; Jiaxiang Zhang; James L McClelland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Utilities of the post-anesthesia state derived by the standard gamble method in surgical patients.

Authors:  Saifudin Rashiq; Diane Edlund; Bruce D Dick
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.796

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.