Literature DB >> 17206871

The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions.

Rafal Bogacz1, Kevin Gurney.   

Abstract

Neurophysiological studies have identified a number of brain regions critically involved in solving the problem of action selection or decision making. In the case of highly practiced tasks, these regions include cortical areas hypothesized to integrate evidence supporting alternative actions and the basal ganglia, hypothesized to act as a central switch in gating behavioral requests. However, despite our relatively detailed knowledge of basal ganglia biology and its connectivity with the cortex and numerical simulation studies demonstrating selective function, no formal theoretical framework exists that supplies an algorithmic description of these circuits. This article shows how many aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the circuit involving the cortex and basal ganglia are exactly those required to implement the computation defined by an asymptotically optimal statistical test for decision making: the multihypothesis sequential probability ratio test (MSPRT). The resulting model of basal ganglia provides a new framework for understanding the computation in the basal ganglia during decision making in highly practiced tasks. The predictions of the theory concerning the properties of particular neuronal populations are validated in existing experimental data. Further, we show that this neurobiologically grounded implementation of MSPRT outperforms other candidates for neural decision making, that it is structurally and parametrically robust, and that it can accommodate cortical mechanisms for decision making in a way that complements those in basal ganglia.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17206871     DOI: 10.1162/neco.2007.19.2.442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neural Comput        ISSN: 0899-7667            Impact factor:   2.026


  140 in total

Review 1.  From reinforcement learning models to psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Authors:  Tiago V Maia; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Thomas V Wiecki; Michael X Cohen; Christina M Figueroa; Johan Samanta; Scott J Sherman; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  A symbolic/subsymbolic interface protocol for cognitive modeling.

Authors:  Patrick Simen; Thad Polk
Journal:  Log J IGPL       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 0.861

Review 4.  Opponency revisited: competition and cooperation between dopamine and serotonin.

Authors:  Y-Lan Boureau; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Distinct dynamics of ramping activity in the frontal cortex and caudate nucleus in monkeys.

Authors:  Long Ding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Irrational time allocation in decision-making.

Authors:  Bastiaan Oud; Ian Krajbich; Kevin Miller; Jin Hyun Cheong; Matthew Botvinick; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice.

Authors:  Rafal Bogacz; Marius Usher; Jiaxiang Zhang; James L McClelland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  The role of the subthalamic nucleus in cognition.

Authors:  David B Weintraub; Kareem A Zaghloul
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.353

Review 9.  The Subthalamic Nucleus: Unravelling New Roles and Mechanisms in the Control of Action.

Authors:  Tora Bonnevie; Kareem A Zaghloul
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 7.519

Review 10.  Neurocomputational models of basal ganglia function in learning, memory and choice.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.