Literature DB >> 1742849

Bayesian estimation of doxorubicin pharmacokinetic parameters.

F Bressolle1, P Ray, J M Jacquet, J Brès, M Galtier, D Donadio, J Jourdan, J F Rossi.   

Abstract

Doxorubicin was given by brief i.v. infusion (doses ranging from 25 to 72 mg/m2) to 28 patients for 2-7 successive courses of chemotherapy (68 courses studied in all). A Bayesian approach was developed to determine the individual pharmacokinetic parameters of doxorubicin. Statistical characteristics of the population pharmacokinetic parameters were first evaluated for 19 patients and a total of 30 courses, which, when combined with 4 individual plasma concentrations of drug, led to a Bayesian estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters for the remaining 38 courses. The estimated parameters for the elimination phase (A3/V1 and t1/2 elimination) and the residual plasma level at 48 h as computed by Bayesian estimation on this reduced sub-optimal sampling protocol were compared with a maximal likelihood estimation of these parameters. No statistically significant differences were found. Performance of the developed methodology was evaluated by computing bias and precision. The mean errors were -0.0315 x 10(-4) l-1 for A3/V1, 0.0839 h for t1/2 elimination, and -0.22 ng/ml for c(48 h). The precision of the prediction of these three parameters (0.304 x 10(-5) l-1, 3.34 h, and 0.659 ng/ml, respectively) remained lower than the interindividual standard deviation (1.42 x 10(-4) l-1, 14.9 h, and 4.54 ng/ml, respectively). This procedure enables the estimation of individual pharmacokinetic parameters for doxorubicin at minimal cost and minimal disturbance of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1742849     DOI: 10.1007/bf00686336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  27 in total

1.  Doxorubicin and doxorubicinol: intra- and inter-individual variations of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  J M Jacquet; F Bressolle; M Galtier; M Bourrier; D Donadio; J Jourdan; J F Rossi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  How much does liver disease affect the pharmacokinetics of adriamycin?

Authors:  S B Kaye; J Cummings; D J Kerr
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1985-08

3.  A Bayesian feedback method of aminoglycoside dosing.

Authors:  M E Burton; D C Brater; P S Chen; R B Day; P J Huber; M R Vasko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Analysis of pharmacokinetic data using parametric models. II. Point estimates of an individual's parameters.

Authors:  L B Sheiner
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1985-10

5.  Bayesian estimation and prediction of clearance in high-dose methotrexate infusions.

Authors:  A Iliadis; M Bachir-Raho; R Bruno; R Favre
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1985-02

6.  Evaluation of methods for estimating population pharmacokinetic parameters. II. Biexponential model and experimental pharmacokinetic data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-10

7.  Application of Bayesian estimation for the prediction of an appropriate dosage regimen of amikacin.

Authors:  R Garraffo; A Iliadis; J P Cano; P Dellamonica; P Lapalus
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of long-term continuous-infusion doxorubicin.

Authors:  S P Ackland; M J Ratain; N J Vogelzang; K E Choi; M Ruane; J A Sinkule
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Plasma pharmacokinetics of adriamycin and adriamycinol: implications for the design of in vitro experiments and treatment protocols.

Authors:  R F Greene; J M Collins; J F Jenkins; J L Speyer; C E Myers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  A limited sampling procedure for estimating adriamycin pharmacokinetics in cancer patients.

Authors:  M C Launay; G Milano; A Iliadis; M Frenay; N Namer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Limited-sampling models for anticancer agents.

Authors:  L J van Warmerdam; W W ten Bokkel Huinink; R A Maes; J H Beijnen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Role of population pharmacokinetics in drug development. A pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  E Samara; R Granneman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Identification of patients with impaired hepatic drug metabolism using a limited sampling procedure for estimation of phenazone (antipyrine) pharmacokinetic parameters.

Authors:  D Fabre; F Bressolle; R Goméni; O Bouvet; A Dubois; C Raffanel; J C Gris; M Galtier
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Benefits of pharmacological knowledge in the design and monitoring of cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  P Canal; E Gamelin; G Vassal; J Robert
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  A limited sampling strategy for the study of pirarubicin pharmacokinetics in humans.

Authors:  D Marchiset-Leca; F R Leca; A Galeani; A Noble; A Iliadis
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.333

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.