Literature DB >> 25877697

Characterizing olfactory binary mixture interactions in Fischer 344 rats using behavioral reaction times.

Wendy M Yoder1, Leslie Gaynor2, Ethan Windham3, Michelle Lyman2, Olivia Munizza2, Barry Setlow4, Jennifer L Bizon, David W Smith5.   

Abstract

Response times provide essential subthreshold perceptual data that extend beyond accuracy alone. Behavioral reaction times (RTs) were used to characterize rats' ability to detect individual odorants in a series of complimentary binary odorant mixture ratios. We employed an automated, liquid-dilution olfactometer to train Fischer 344 rats (N = 8) on an odor identification task using nonreinforced probe trials. Binary mixture ratios composed of aliphatic odorants (citral and octanol) were arranged such that relative contributions of the 2 components varied systematically by a factor of 1% (v/v). Odorant concentrations for the target (S+), control (S-), and mixture (S+:S-) odorants were presented relative to threshold for each rat. Rats were initially trained to respond by licking at a spout to obtain liquid reward for either citral or octanol as the reinforced target (S+) odorant. After achieving 100% accuracy, rats were transferred to variable ratio (VR 2) reinforcement for correct responding. Nonreinforced probe trials (2 per block of 22 trials) were tested for each mixture ratio and recorded as either S+ (rats lick-responded in the presence of the mixture) or S- (rats refrained from licking), thereby indicating detection of the trained, S+ odorant. To determine the perceived salience for each ratio, RTs (latency from odorant onset to lick response) were recorded for each trial. Consistent with previous studies, RTs for both odorants were shortest (~150-200ms) when the probe trials consisted of a single, monomolecular component. Binary mixtures that contained as little as 1% of the S-, nontarget odorant, however, were sufficiently different perceptually to increase behavioral RTs (i.e., rats hesitated longer before responding); RTs changed systematically as a function of the binary ratio. Interestingly, the rate of RT change was dependent on which odorant served as the S+, suggesting an asymmetric interaction between the 2 odorants. The data demonstrate the value of behavioral RT as a sensitive measure of suprathreshold perceptual responding.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fischer 344 rats; binary mixtures; odor discrimination; perception; psychophysics; reaction times

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25877697      PMCID: PMC4542899          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  52 in total

1.  Peripheral odor coding in the rat and frog: quality and intensity specification.

Authors:  P Duchamp-Viret; A Duchamp; M A Chaput
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Latency and accuracy of discriminations of odor quality between binary mixtures and their components.

Authors:  P M Wise; W S Cain
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Perceptual correlates of neural representations evoked by odorant enantiomers.

Authors:  C Linster; B A Johnson; E Yue; A Morse; Z Xu; E E Hingco; Y Choi; M Choi; A Messiha; M Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Single olfactory sensory neurons simultaneously integrate the components of an odour mixture.

Authors:  Patricia Duchamp-Viret; André Duchamp; Michel A Chaput
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Quantification of chemical vapors in chemosensory research.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; William S Cain; Michael H Abraham
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Performance of mice in an automated olfactometer: odor detection, discrimination and odor memory.

Authors:  N Bodyak; B Slotnick
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Lesions of orbitofrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala complex disrupt acquisition of odor-guided discriminations and reversals.

Authors:  Geoffrey Schoenbaum; Barry Setlow; Summer L Nugent; Michael P Saddoris; Michela Gallagher
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Brett A Johnson; Alix Morse; Esther Yue; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat.

Authors:  Naoshige Uchida; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-19       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Receptor contributions to configural and elemental odor mixture perception.

Authors:  Leslie M Kay; Catherine A Lowry; Heather A Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  3 in total

1.  Decline of prefrontal cortical-mediated executive functions but attenuated delay discounting in aged Fischer 344 × brown Norway hybrid rats.

Authors:  Caesar M Hernandez; Lauren M Vetere; Caitlin A Orsini; Joseph A McQuail; Andrew P Maurer; Sara N Burke; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Awake, long-term intranasal insulin treatment does not affect object memory, odor discrimination, or reversal learning in mice.

Authors:  Genevieve A Bell; Debra Ann Fadool
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-03-02

3.  Interaction between age and perceptual similarity in olfactory discrimination learning in F344 rats: relationships with spatial learning.

Authors:  Wendy M Yoder; Leslie S Gaynor; Sara N Burke; Barry Setlow; David W Smith; Jennifer L Bizon
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 4.673

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.