BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-resolution carotid MR imaging can accurately identify complicated American Heart Association lesion type VI plaques, which are characterized by thrombus, hemorrhage, or a ruptured fibrous cap. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether CTA can be used as screening tool to predict the presence or absence of American Heart Association lesion type VI plaques as defined by high-resolution MR imaging. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with suspected ischemic stroke or TIA with carotid CTA and carotid MR imaging performed within 14 days of the event/admission from April 2008 to December 2010 were reviewed. Vessels with stents or occlusion were excluded (n = 2). Each carotid artery was assigned an American Heart Association lesion type classification by MR imaging. The maximum wall thickness, maximum soft plaque component thickness, maximum calcified component thickness, and its attenuation (if the soft plaque component thickness was >2 mm) were obtained from the CTA. RESULTS: The maximum soft plaque component thickness proved the best discriminating factor to predict a complicated plaque by MR imaging, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.89. The optimal sensitivity and specificity for detection of complicated plaque by MR imaging was achieved with a soft plaque component thickness threshold of 4.4 mm (sensitivity, 0.65; specificity, 0.94; positive predictive value, 0.75; and negative predictive value, 0.9). No complicated plaque had a soft tissue plaque thickness <2.2 mm (negative predictive value, 1) and no simple (noncomplicated) plaque had a thickness >5.6 mm (positive predictive value, 1). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum soft plaque component thickness as measured by carotid CTA is a reliable indicator of a complicated plaque, with a threshold of 2.2 mm representing little to no probability of a complicated American Heart Association lesion type VI plaque.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-resolution carotid MR imaging can accurately identify complicated American Heart Association lesion type VI plaques, which are characterized by thrombus, hemorrhage, or a ruptured fibrous cap. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether CTA can be used as screening tool to predict the presence or absence of American Heart Association lesion type VI plaques as defined by high-resolution MR imaging. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with suspected ischemic stroke or TIA with carotid CTA and carotid MR imaging performed within 14 days of the event/admission from April 2008 to December 2010 were reviewed. Vessels with stents or occlusion were excluded (n = 2). Each carotid artery was assigned an American Heart Association lesion type classification by MR imaging. The maximum wall thickness, maximum soft plaque component thickness, maximum calcified component thickness, and its attenuation (if the soft plaque component thickness was >2 mm) were obtained from the CTA. RESULTS: The maximum soft plaque component thickness proved the best discriminating factor to predict a complicated plaque by MR imaging, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.89. The optimal sensitivity and specificity for detection of complicated plaque by MR imaging was achieved with a soft plaque component thickness threshold of 4.4 mm (sensitivity, 0.65; specificity, 0.94; positive predictive value, 0.75; and negative predictive value, 0.9). No complicated plaque had a soft tissue plaque thickness <2.2 mm (negative predictive value, 1) and no simple (noncomplicated) plaque had a thickness >5.6 mm (positive predictive value, 1). CONCLUSIONS: Maximum soft plaque component thickness as measured by carotid CTA is a reliable indicator of a complicated plaque, with a threshold of 2.2 mm representing little to no probability of a complicated American Heart Association lesion type VI plaque.
Authors: Jaywant P Parmar; Walter J Rogers; John P Mugler; Erol Baskurt; Talissa A Altes; Kiran R Nandalur; George J Stukenborg; C Douglas Phillips; Klaus D Hagspiel; Alan H Matsumoto; Michael D Dake; Christopher M Kramer Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Nayak L Polissar; Gail P Jarvik; Carol Isaac; Judith McDonough; Cynthia Natiello; Randy Small; Marina S Ferguson; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-05-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas T de Weert; Sander Cretier; Harald C Groen; Philip Homburg; Hamit Cakir; Jolanda J Wentzel; Diederik W J Dippel; Aad van der Lugt Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: R Magge; B C Lau; B P Soares; S Fischette; S Arora; E Tong; S Cheng; M Wintermark Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert M Kwee; Martine T B Truijman; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Werner H Mess; Martin H Prins; Cees L Franke; Arthur G G C Korten; Joachim E Wildberger; M Eline Kooi Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: L B Eisenmenger; B W Aldred; S-E Kim; G J Stoddard; A de Havenon; G S Treiman; D L Parker; J S McNally Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: John C Benson; Giuseppe Lanzino; Valentina Nardi; Luis Savastano; Amir Lerman; Waleed Brinjikji Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Jonathan M Coutinho; Sheldon Derkatch; Alphonse R J Potvin; George Tomlinson; Tim-Rasmus Kiehl; Frank L Silver; Daniel M Mandell Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jonathan M Coutinho; Sheldon Derkatch; Alphonse R J Potvin; George Tomlinson; Leanne K Casaubon; Frank L Silver; Daniel M Mandell Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: J C Benson; V Nardi; A A Madhavan; M C Bois; L Saba; L Savastano; A Lerman; G Lanzino Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: M Tang; X Yan; J Gao; L Li; X Zhe; Xin Zhang; F Jiang; J Hu; N Ma; K Ai; Xiaoling Zhang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 4.966
Authors: A Gupta; E E Mtui; H Baradaran; G Salama; A Pandya; H Kamel; A Giambrone; P C Sanelli Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: H Baradaran; K Al-Dasuqi; A Knight-Greenfield; A Giambrone; D Delgado; E J Ebani; H Kamel; A Gupta Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 3.825