OBJECTIVES: To compare mammographic density among premenopausal and early perimenopausal women from four racial/ethnic groups and to examine density and acculturation among Japanese and Chinese women. DESIGN: The study included 391 white, 60 African American, 171 Japanese, and 179 Chinese participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, a multisite study of US women transitioning through menopause. Mammograms done when women were premenopausal or early perimenopausal were assessed for area of dense breast tissue and the percent of the breast occupied by dense tissue (percent density). Information on race/ethnicity, acculturation, and other factors was obtained from standardized instruments. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to examine the association between race/ethnicity or acculturation and density measures. RESULTS: Age-adjusted mean percent density was highest for Chinese (52%) and lowest for African American (34%) women. After additional adjustment for body mass index, menopause status, age at first birth, breast-feeding duration, waist circumference, and smoking, African Americans had the highest mean percent density (51%) and Japanese women had the lowest (39%). In contrast, the area of dense tissue was highest for African Americans and similar for white, Japanese, and Chinese women. Less acculturated Chinese and Japanese women tended to have a larger area of density and a higher percent density. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the age-adjusted nor fully adjusted results for percent density or area of dense tissue reflected current differences in breast cancer incidence rates among similarly aged African American, Japanese, Chinese, and white women. In addition, mammographic density was higher in less acculturated Asian women.
OBJECTIVES: To compare mammographic density among premenopausal and early perimenopausal women from four racial/ethnic groups and to examine density and acculturation among Japanese and Chinese women. DESIGN: The study included 391 white, 60 African American, 171 Japanese, and 179 Chinese participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, a multisite study of US women transitioning through menopause. Mammograms done when women were premenopausal or early perimenopausal were assessed for area of dense breast tissue and the percent of the breast occupied by dense tissue (percent density). Information on race/ethnicity, acculturation, and other factors was obtained from standardized instruments. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to examine the association between race/ethnicity or acculturation and density measures. RESULTS: Age-adjusted mean percent density was highest for Chinese (52%) and lowest for African American (34%) women. After additional adjustment for body mass index, menopause status, age at first birth, breast-feeding duration, waist circumference, and smoking, African Americans had the highest mean percent density (51%) and Japanese women had the lowest (39%). In contrast, the area of dense tissue was highest for African Americans and similar for white, Japanese, and Chinese women. Less acculturated Chinese and Japanese women tended to have a larger area of density and a higher percent density. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the age-adjusted nor fully adjusted results for percent density or area of dense tissue reflected current differences in breast cancer incidence rates among similarly aged African American, Japanese, Chinese, and white women. In addition, mammographic density was higher in less acculturated Asian women.
Authors: Nicholas P Gruszauskas; Karen Drukker; Maryellen L Giger; Ruey-Feng Chang; Charlene A Sennett; Woo Kyung Moon; Lorenzo L Pesce Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Shannon M Conroy; Lesley M Butler; Danielle Harvey; Ellen B Gold; Barbara Sternfeld; Nina Oestreicher; Gail A Greendale; Laurel A Habel Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Mellissa Yong; Stephen M Schwartz; Charlotte Atkinson; Karen W Makar; Sushma S Thomas; Katherine M Newton; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Victoria L Holt; Wendy M Leisenring; Johanna W Lampe Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Marian L Neuhouser; Leslie Bernstein; Bruce W Hollis; Liren Xiao; Anita Ambs; Kathy Baumgartner; Richard Baumgartner; Anne McTiernan; Rachel Ballard-Barbash Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Anne Marie McCarthy; Brad M Keller; Lauren M Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Marie Synnestvedt; Emily F Conant; Katrina Armstrong; Despina Kontos Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-04-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Carolyn J Crandall; Mary E Sehl; Sybil L Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Laurel A Habel; Lesley M Butler; Maryfran R Sowers; Gail A Greendale; Janet S Sinsheimer Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Shannon M Conroy; Carolyn J Crandall; Gail A Greendale; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 2.506