Literature DB >> 17413476

Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.

Munish C Gupta1, Shirvinda Wijesekera, Allen Sossan, Linda Martin, Lawrence C Vogel, Jennette L Boakes, Joel A Lerman, Craig M McDonald, Randall R Betz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective review of radiographic data.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define interobserver and intraobserver variability to further delineate reliable means by which radiographs of patients with neuromuscular scoliosis can be examined. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies analyzed the use of Cobb angles in the measurement of idiopathic and congenital scoliosis, but no study until now describes a critical analysis of measurement in evaluating neuromuscular scoliosis.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients with neuromuscular scoliosis radiographs were reviewed. These were evaluated for Cobb angle, end vertebrae selection, Ferguson angle, apex of the curve, C7 balance, pelvic obliquity, Risser sign, status of the triradiate cartilage, kyphosis Cobb angle, endplate selection for kyphosis, and kyphotic index. Interclass and intraclass variability was examined with statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Cobb angle had an intraobserver variability was 5.7 degrees and the interobserver variability was 14.8 degrees . The intraobserver and interobserver variability for Ferguson angle was 6.8 degrees and 20.6 degrees, respectively. The kyphotic Cobb angle intraobserver variability was found to be 17.4 degrees, and the interobserver variability was 24.01 degrees .
CONCLUSIONS: Neuromuscular scoliosis radiographs can be reliably analyzed with the use of Cobb angle. Other forms of analysis, such as Ferguson angle, are not as reliable. Pelvic obliquity should be measured from the horizontal, as other methods are not as reliable. Kyphosis is best evaluated with the use of the kyphotic Cobb angle. Finally, it is felt that a separate anteroposterior pelvis radiograph should be used to assess skeletal maturity, as scoliosis films often truncate the vital anatomy necessary to determine skeletal maturity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17413476     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257524.23074.ed

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

1.  Pelvic fixation for neuromuscular scoliosis deformity correction.

Authors:  Romain Dayer; Jean Albert Ouellet; Neil Saran
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-06

2.  Can the caudal extent of fusion in the surgical treatment of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy be stopped at lumbar 5?

Authors:  Masashi Takaso; Toshiyuki Nakazawa; Takayuki Imura; Masaki Ueno; Wataru Saito; Ryousuke Shintani; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Seiji Ohtori; Makihito Okamoto; Takashi Masaki; Hirotsugu Okamoto; Toshiyuki Okutomi; Kazuhiro Ishii; Yasuhiro Ueda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  The role of the neuromuscular medicine and physiatry specialists in the multidisciplinary management of neuromuscular disease.

Authors:  Craig M McDonald; William M Fowler
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  Comparison between Operated Muscular Dystrophy and Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patients in terms of Radiological, Pulmonary and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  Hyon Su Chong; Eun Su Moon; Hak Sun Kim; Nanda Ankur; Jin Oh Park; Jin Young Kim; Phillip Anthony B Kho; Seong Hwan Moon; Hwan Mo Lee; Nam Hun Seul
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-11-24

5.  Impact of patient position on coronal Cobb angle measurement in non-ambulatory myelodysplastic patients.

Authors:  Norman Ramirez; Jorge Padilla; Sigfredo Villarin; Francisco Irizarry; Ivan Iriarte; Jeffrey Sawyer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-18

6.  Effect of direct vertebral body derotation on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Amer F Samdani; Loyola V Gressot; Kyle Hubler; Michelle C Marks; Tracey P Bastrom; Randal R Betz; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Variability of expert opinion in treatment of early-onset scoliosis.

Authors:  Michael G Vitale; Jaime A Gomez; Hiroko Matsumoto; David P Roye
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Preventing proximal junctional failure in long segmental instrumented cases of adult degenerative scoliosis using a multilevel stabilization screw technique.

Authors:  Lee Sandquist; Daniel Carr; Doris Tong; Roger Gonda; Teck M Soo
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-06-25

9.  The Variability of Pelvic Obliquity Measurements in Patients with Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

Authors:  Alexa J Karkenny; Lacey C Magee; Matthew R Landrum; Jason B Anari; David Spiegel; Keith Baldwin
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-03-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.