Literature DB >> 29915954

Impact of patient position on coronal Cobb angle measurement in non-ambulatory myelodysplastic patients.

Norman Ramirez1, Jorge Padilla2, Sigfredo Villarin2, Francisco Irizarry2, Ivan Iriarte2, Jeffrey Sawyer3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of patient position on the magnitude of the coronal Cobb angle measurements in relation to the change of position using plain radiograph on non-ambulatory children with myelodysplasia. Whole-spine radiographs with the patient sitting generally are preferred for the diagnosis and monitoring of progression of scoliosis in neuromuscular patients. Supine, supine traction, and sitting push-up positions have been used as substitutes, although there is no general consensus validating if these positions correlate with the sitting position. The magnitude of the Cobb angles in neuromuscular scoliosis may vary greatly depending on the position of the patient.
METHODS: Radiographs of 39 myelodysplastic, non-ambulatory children were evaluated to assess the impact of change in positions (unsupported sitting, sitting push-up, supine, and supine traction) on coronal Cobb angle measurement using plain whole-spine radiographs.
RESULTS: The mean difference in thoracic Cobb angle measurements between sitting and all other positions ranged from 6° to 12°. At the lumbar level, the Cobb angles ranged from 12° to 16°.
CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant differences in the Cobb angle measurements were identified between plain radiographs of the whole spine with the patient in the unsupported sitting position compared to sitting push-up, supine, and supine traction positions. The data support that the magnitude of the Cobb angles in neuromuscular scoliosis varies greatly depending on the position of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronal Cobb angle; Myelodysplasia; Neuromuscular scoliosis; Spine radiograph

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29915954     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2264-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiographs and supine axially loaded MRI.

Authors:  Per Wessberg; Barbro I Danielson; Jan Willén
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Neuromuscular Scoliosis: Current Concepts.

Authors:  Mohamad J Halawi; Robert K Lark; Robert D Fitch
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Standing and supine Cobb measures in girls with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  G Torell; A Nachemson; K Haderspeck-Grib; A Schultz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Clinical and radiographic predictors of scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Jayesh Trivedi; Jeffrey D Thomson; Joseph B Slakey; John V Banta; Peter W Jones
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs.

Authors:  Mark C Lee; Matthew Solomito; Archit Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  The association between race/ethnicity and major birth defects in the United States, 1999-2007.

Authors:  Mark A Canfield; Cara T Mai; Ying Wang; Alissa O'Halloran; Lisa K Marengo; Richard S Olney; Christopher L Borger; Rachel Rutkowski; Jane Fornoff; Nila Irwin; Glenn Copeland; Timothy J Flood; Robert E Meyer; Russel Rickard; C J Alverson; Joseph Sweatlock; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.

Authors:  Munish C Gupta; Shirvinda Wijesekera; Allen Sossan; Linda Martin; Lawrence C Vogel; Jennette L Boakes; Joel A Lerman; Craig M McDonald; Randall R Betz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Supine to standing Cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of endplate pre-selection.

Authors:  Bethany E Keenan; Maree T Izatt; Geoffrey N Askin; Robert D Labrom; Mark J Pearcy; Clayton J Adam
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2014-10-08

9.  A Comparison of Cobb Angle: Standing Versus Supine Images of Late-Onset Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Ludvig Vavruch; Hans Tropp
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-10

10.  Upright, prone, and supine spinal morphology and alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Rob C Brink; Dino Colo; Tom P C Schlösser; Koen L Vincken; Marijn van Stralen; Steve C N Hui; Lin Shi; Winnie C W Chu; Jack C Y Cheng; René M Castelein
Journal:  Scoliosis Spinal Disord       Date:  2017-02-22
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Proper positioning of mice for Cobb angle radiographic measurements.

Authors:  Zhe Yi Chen; Keith Dip Kei Luk; You Qiang Song; Bo Gao; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.