Literature DB >> 17410126

Template switching during break-induced replication.

Catherine E Smith1, Bertrand Llorente, Lorraine S Symington.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are potentially lethal lesions that arise spontaneously during normal cellular metabolism, as a consequence of environmental genotoxins or radiation, or during programmed recombination processes. Repair of DSBs by homologous recombination generally occurs by gene conversion resulting from transfer of information from an intact donor duplex to both ends of the break site of the broken chromosome. In mitotic cells, gene conversion is rarely associated with reciprocal exchange and thus limits loss of heterozygosity for markers downstream of the site of repair and restricts potentially deleterious chromosome rearrangements. DSBs that arise by replication fork collapse or by erosion of uncapped telomeres have only one free end and are thought to repair by strand invasion into a homologous duplex DNA followed by replication to the chromosome end (break-induced replication, BIR). BIR from one of the two ends of a DSB would result in loss of heterozygosity, suggesting that BIR is suppressed when DSBs have two ends so that repair occurs by the more conservative gene conversion mechanism. Here we show that BIR can occur by several rounds of strand invasion, DNA synthesis and dissociation. We further show that chromosome rearrangements can occur during BIR if dissociation and reinvasion occur within dispersed repeated sequences. This dynamic process could function to promote gene conversion by capture of the displaced invading strand at two-ended DSBs to prevent BIR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17410126     DOI: 10.1038/nature05723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  189 in total

1.  Genome-wide mapping and assembly of structural variant breakpoints in the mouse genome.

Authors:  Aaron R Quinlan; Royden A Clark; Svetlana Sokolova; Mitchell L Leibowitz; Yujun Zhang; Matthew E Hurles; Joshua C Mell; Ira M Hall
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  DNA REPAIR. Mus81 and converging forks limit the mutagenicity of replication fork breakage.

Authors:  Ryan Mayle; Ian M Campbell; Christine R Beck; Yang Yu; Marenda Wilson; Chad A Shaw; Lotte Bjergbaek; James R Lupski; Grzegorz Ira
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Targeted gene therapies: tools, applications, optimization.

Authors:  Olivier Humbert; Luther Davis; Nancy Maizels
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.250

4.  XRCC2 and XRCC3 regulate the balance between short- and long-tract gene conversions between sister chromatids.

Authors:  Ganesh Nagaraju; Andrea Hartlerode; Amy Kwok; Gurushankar Chandramouly; Ralph Scully
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  A recombination execution checkpoint regulates the choice of homologous recombination pathway during DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Suvi Jain; Neal Sugawara; John Lydeard; Moreshwar Vaze; Nicolas Tanguy Le Gac; James E Haber
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome.

Authors:  Juan Lucas Argueso; James Westmoreland; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Malgorzata Gawel; Thomas D Petes; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Break-induced replication occurs by conservative DNA synthesis.

Authors:  Roberto A Donnianni; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Break-induced DNA replication.

Authors:  Ranjith P Anand; Susan T Lovett; James E Haber
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  DNA polymerases are error-prone at RecA-mediated recombination intermediates.

Authors:  Richard T Pomerantz; Myron F Goodman; Michael E O'Donnell
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Leaping forks at inverted repeats.

Authors:  Dana Branzei; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.