Literature DB >> 20047996

Leaping forks at inverted repeats.

Dana Branzei1, Marco Foiani.   

Abstract

Genome rearrangements are often associated with genome instability observed in cancer and other pathological disorders. Different types of repeat elements are common in genomes and are prone to instability. S-phase checkpoints, recombination, and telomere maintenance pathways have been implicated in suppressing chromosome rearrangements, but little is known about the molecular mechanisms and the chromosome intermediates generating such genome-wide instability. In the December 15, 2009, issue of Genes & Development, two studies by Paek and colleagues (2861-2875) and Mizuno and colleagues (pp. 2876-2886), demonstrate that nearby inverted repeats in budding and fission yeasts recombine spontaneously and frequently to form dicentric and acentric chromosomes. The recombination mechanism underlying this phenomenon does not appear to require double-strand break formation, and is likely caused by a replication mechanism involving template switching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20047996      PMCID: PMC2802191          DOI: 10.1101/gad.1884810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  46 in total

Review 1.  Alu repeats and human genomic diversity.

Authors:  Mark A Batzer; Prescott L Deininger
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Molecular-evolutionary mechanisms for genomic disorders.

Authors:  Pawel Stankiewicz; James R Lupski
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments.

Authors:  Xavier Veaute; Josette Jeusset; Christine Soustelle; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Eric Le Cam; Francis Fabre
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms for genomic disorders.

Authors:  Ken Inoue; James R Lupski
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  The yeast CDK inhibitor Sic1 prevents genomic instability by promoting replication origin licensing in late G(1).

Authors:  Armelle Lengronne; Etienne Schwob
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  The Mre11 complex is required for repair of hairpin-capped double-strand breaks and prevention of chromosome rearrangements.

Authors:  Kirill S Lobachev; Dmitry A Gordenin; Michael A Resnick
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Richard D Kolodner; Christopher D Putnam; Kyungjae Myung
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones.

Authors:  Rita S Cha; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.

Authors:  José M Sogo; Massimo Lopes; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament.

Authors:  Lumir Krejci; Stephen Van Komen; Ying Li; Jana Villemain; Mothe Sreedhar Reddy; Hannah Klein; Thomas Ellenberger; Patrick Sung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Telomere dysfunction and chromosome instability.

Authors:  John P Murnane
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Chromosome catastrophes involve replication mechanisms generating complex genomic rearrangements.

Authors:  Pengfei Liu; Ayelet Erez; Sandesh C Sreenath Nagamani; Shweta U Dhar; Katarzyna E Kołodziejska; Avinash V Dharmadhikari; M Lance Cooper; Joanna Wiszniewska; Feng Zhang; Marjorie A Withers; Carlos A Bacino; Luis Daniel Campos-Acevedo; Mauricio R Delgado; Debra Freedenberg; Adolfo Garnica; Theresa A Grebe; Dolores Hernández-Almaguer; LaDonna Immken; Seema R Lalani; Scott D McLean; Hope Northrup; Fernando Scaglia; Lane Strathearn; Pamela Trapane; Sung-Hae L Kang; Ankita Patel; Sau Wai Cheung; P J Hastings; Paweł Stankiewicz; James R Lupski; Weimin Bi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  All y'all need to know 'bout retroelements in cancer.

Authors:  Victoria P Belancio; Astrid M Roy-Engel; Prescott L Deininger
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 15.707

4.  Replication fork stability is essential for the maintenance of centromere integrity in the absence of heterochromatin.

Authors:  Pao-Chen Li; Ruben C Petreaca; Amanda Jensen; Ji-Ping Yuan; Marc D Green; Susan L Forsburg
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Non-B DNA Secondary Structures and Their Resolution by RecQ Helicases.

Authors:  Sudha Sharma
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2011-10-02

6.  Short inverted repeats contribute to localized mutability in human somatic cells.

Authors:  Xueqing Zou; Sandro Morganella; Dominik Glodzik; Helen Davies; Yilin Li; Michael R Stratton; Serena Nik-Zainal
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The Prevalence and Evolutionary Conservation of Inverted Repeats in Proteobacteria.

Authors:  Bar Lavi; Eli Levy Karin; Tal Pupko; Einat Hazkani-Covo
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.416

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.