PURPOSE: Glioblastomas are treated by surgical resection followed by radiotherapy [X-ray therapy (XRT)] and the alkylating chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide. Recently, inactivating mutations in the mismatch repair gene MSH6 were identified in two glioblastomas recurrent post-temozolomide. Because mismatch repair pathway inactivation is a known mediator of alkylator resistance in vitro, these findings suggested that MSH6 inactivation was causally linked to these two recurrences. However, the extent of involvement of MSH6 in glioblastoma is unknown. We sought to determine the overall frequency and clinical relevance of MSH6 alterations in glioblastomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The MSH6 gene was sequenced in 54 glioblastomas. MSH6 and O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) immunohistochemistry was systematically scored in a panel of 46 clinically well-characterized glioblastomas, and the corresponding patient response to treatment evaluated. RESULTS: MSH6 mutation was not observed in any pretreatment glioblastoma (0 of 40), whereas 3 of 14 recurrent cases had somatic mutations (P = 0.015). MSH6 protein expression was detected in all pretreatment (17 of 17) cases examined but, notably, expression was lost in 7 of 17 (41%) recurrences from matched post-XRT + temozolomide cases (P = 0.016). Loss of MSH6 was not associated with O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase status. Measurements of in vivo tumor growth using three-dimensional reconstructed magnetic resonance imaging showed that MSH6-negative glioblastomas had a markedly increased rate of growth while under temozolomide treatment (3.17 versus 0.04 cc/mo for MSH6-positive tumors; P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of MSH6 occurs in a subset of post-XRT + temozolomide glioblastoma recurrences and is associated with tumor progression during temozolomide treatment, mirroring the alkylator resistance conferred by MSH6 inactivation in vitro. MSH6 deficiency may therefore contribute to the emergence of recurrent glioblastomas during temozolomide treatment.
PURPOSE:Glioblastomas are treated by surgical resection followed by radiotherapy [X-ray therapy (XRT)] and the alkylating chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide. Recently, inactivating mutations in the mismatch repair gene MSH6 were identified in two glioblastomas recurrent post-temozolomide. Because mismatch repair pathway inactivation is a known mediator of alkylator resistance in vitro, these findings suggested that MSH6 inactivation was causally linked to these two recurrences. However, the extent of involvement of MSH6 in glioblastoma is unknown. We sought to determine the overall frequency and clinical relevance of MSH6 alterations in glioblastomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The MSH6 gene was sequenced in 54 glioblastomas. MSH6 and O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) immunohistochemistry was systematically scored in a panel of 46 clinically well-characterized glioblastomas, and the corresponding patient response to treatment evaluated. RESULTS:MSH6 mutation was not observed in any pretreatment glioblastoma (0 of 40), whereas 3 of 14 recurrent cases had somatic mutations (P = 0.015). MSH6 protein expression was detected in all pretreatment (17 of 17) cases examined but, notably, expression was lost in 7 of 17 (41%) recurrences from matched post-XRT + temozolomide cases (P = 0.016). Loss of MSH6 was not associated with O(6)-methylguanine methyltransferase status. Measurements of in vivo tumor growth using three-dimensional reconstructed magnetic resonance imaging showed that MSH6-negative glioblastomas had a markedly increased rate of growth while under temozolomide treatment (3.17 versus 0.04 cc/mo for MSH6-positive tumors; P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of MSH6 occurs in a subset of post-XRT + temozolomideglioblastoma recurrences and is associated with tumor progression during temozolomide treatment, mirroring the alkylator resistance conferred by MSH6 inactivation in vitro. MSH6 deficiency may therefore contribute to the emergence of recurrent glioblastomas during temozolomide treatment.
Authors: Madhuri R Hegde; Belinda Chong; Maria E Blazo; Lip Hon E Chin; Patricia A Ward; Murali M Chintagumpala; John Y Kim; Sharon E Plon; C Sue Richards Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Heather Hampel; Wendy L Frankel; Edward Martin; Mark Arnold; Karamjit Khanduja; Philip Kuebler; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Kaisa Sotamaa; Thomas W Prior; Judith Westman; Jenny Panescu; Dan Fix; Janet Lockman; Ilene Comeras; Albert de la Chapelle Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Chris Hunter; Raffaella Smith; Daniel P Cahill; Philip Stephens; Claire Stevens; Jon Teague; Chris Greenman; Sarah Edkins; Graham Bignell; Helen Davies; Sarah O'Meara; Adrian Parker; Tim Avis; Syd Barthorpe; Lisa Brackenbury; Gemma Buck; Adam Butler; Jody Clements; Jennifer Cole; Ed Dicks; Simon Forbes; Matthew Gorton; Kristian Gray; Kelly Halliday; Rachel Harrison; Katy Hills; Jonathon Hinton; Andy Jenkinson; David Jones; Vivienne Kosmidou; Ross Laman; Richard Lugg; Andrew Menzies; Janet Perry; Robert Petty; Keiran Raine; David Richardson; Rebecca Shepherd; Alexandra Small; Helen Solomon; Calli Tofts; Jennifer Varian; Sofie West; Sara Widaa; Andy Yates; Douglas F Easton; Gregory Riggins; Jennifer E Roy; Kymberly K Levine; Wolf Mueller; Tracy T Batchelor; David N Louis; Michael R Stratton; P Andrew Futreal; Richard Wooster Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Roger Stupp; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Michael Weller; Barbara Fisher; Martin J B Taphoorn; Karl Belanger; Alba A Brandes; Christine Marosi; Ulrich Bogdahn; Jürgen Curschmann; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Thierry Gorlia; Anouk Allgeier; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; René O Mirimanoff Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rebecca A Barnetson; Albert Tenesa; Susan M Farrington; Iain D Nicholl; Roseanne Cetnarskyj; Mary E Porteous; Harry Campbell; Malcolm G Dunlop Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A K Annamalai; A F Dean; N Kandasamy; K Kovacs; H Burton; D J Halsall; A S Shaw; N M Antoun; H K Cheow; R W Kirollos; J D Pickard; H L Simpson; S J Jefferies; N G Burnet; M Gurnell Journal: Pituitary Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.107
Authors: Hinke F van Thuijl; Tali Mazor; Brett E Johnson; Shaun D Fouse; Koki Aihara; Chibo Hong; Annika Malmström; Martin Hallbeck; Jan J Heimans; Jenneke J Kloezeman; Marie Stenmark-Askmalm; Martine L M Lamfers; Nobuhito Saito; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Akitake Mukasa; Mitchell S Berger; Peter Söderkvist; Barry S Taylor; Annette M Molinaro; Pieter Wesseling; Jaap C Reijneveld; Susan M Chang; Bauke Ylstra; Joseph F Costello Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: David Svilar; Madhu Dyavaiah; Ashley R Brown; Jiang-bo Tang; Jianfeng Li; Peter R McDonald; Tong Ying Shun; Andrea Braganza; Xiao-hong Wang; Salony Maniar; Claudette M St Croix; John S Lazo; Ian F Pollack; Thomas J Begley; Robert W Sobol Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 5.852