Literature DB >> 35642428

Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Paul Broadley1, Mostafa R A Nabawy1,2, Mark K Quinn1, William J Crowther1.   

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic and critical review of dynamic experimental rigs used for insect wing aerodynamics research. The goal is to facilitate meaningful comparison of data from existing rigs and provide insights for designers of new rigs. The scope extends from simple one degree of freedom rotary rigs to multi degrees of freedom rigs allowing various rotation and translation motions. Experimental methods are characterized using a consistent set of parameters that allows objective comparison of different approaches. A comprehensive catalogue is presented for the tested flow conditions (assessed through Reynolds number, Rossby number and advance ratio), wing morphologies (assessed through aspect ratio, planform shape and thickness to mean chord ratio) and kinematics (assessed through motion degrees of freedom). Links are made between the type of aerodynamic characteristics being studied and the type of experimental set-up used. Rig mechanical design considerations are assessed, and the aerodynamic measurements obtained from these rigs are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamic similarity; experimental rigs; flapping wings; insect flight; revolving wings; robotic insect

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35642428      PMCID: PMC9156915          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.293


  63 in total

1.  Aero-optimum hovering kinematics.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowther
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.956

2.  The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings.

Authors:  Will J Maybury; Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Qingfeng Huang; Xinyan Deng; Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Ground effect on the aerodynamics of three-dimensional hovering wings.

Authors:  H Lu; K B Lua; Y J Lee; T T Lim; K S Yeo
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.956

Review 5.  Flapping wing aerodynamics: from insects to vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; David Lentink
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Quasi-steady aerodynamic model of clap-and-fling flapping MAV and validation using free-flight data.

Authors:  S F Armanini; J V Caetano; G C H E de Croon; C C de Visser; M Mulder
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.956

7.  The influence of wing-wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight.

Authors:  James M Birch; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments.

Authors:  Z Jane Wang; James M Birch; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Aerial locomotion in flies and robots: kinematic control and aerodynamics of oscillating wings.

Authors:  Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  Arthropod Struct Dev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.010

10.  The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight.

Authors:  Sanjay P Sane; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Authors:  Paul Broadley; Mostafa R A Nabawy; Mark K Quinn; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.