Literature DB >> 17392838

Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency.

J Powell1, N Gilo, M Foote, K Gil, J P Lavin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine chief residents' experience with vacuum and forceps deliveries and self-perceived competencies with the procedures. STUDY
DESIGN: Study 1: A written questionnaire was mailed to all fourth year residents in US RRC approved Ob/Gyn programs. Study 2: The study was replicated using a web-based survey the following year. Data were analyzed with chi (2) and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests using SPSS.
RESULTS: Surveys were received from 238 residents (20%) in Study 1 and 269 residents in Study 2 (23%, representing 50% of all residency programs). In both studies, residents reported performing significantly less forceps than vacuum deliveries. Virtually all residents wanted to learn to perform both deliveries, indicated attendings were willing to teach both, and felt competent to perform vacuum deliveries (Study 1, 94.5%; Study 2, 98.5%); only half felt competent to perform forceps deliveries (Study 1, 57.6%; Study 2, 55.0%). The majority of residents who felt competent to perform forceps deliveries reported that they would predominately use forceps or both methods of deliveries in their practice (Study 1, 75.8%; Study 2, 64.6%). The majority of residents who reported that they did not feel competent to perform forceps deliveries reported that they would predominately use vacuum deliveries in their practice (Study 1, 86.1%; Study 2, 84.2%).
CONCLUSION: Current training results in a substantial portion of residents graduating who do not feel competent to perform forceps deliveries. Perceived competency affected future operative delivery plans.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17392838     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  8 in total

1.  The Changing Scenario of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training.

Authors:  Natasha Gupta; Kristina Dragovic; Richard Trester; Josef Blankstein
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-09

2.  An international assessment of trainee experience, confidence, and comfort in operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  D A Crosby; A Sarangapani; A Simpson; R Windrim; A Satkunaratnam; M F Higgins
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Single prior caesarean section and risk of anal sphincter injury.

Authors:  Bobby D O'Leary; Ciara E Nolan; Vineta Ciprike
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Taking a stand for operative vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Christopher Ng
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Does the number of forceps deliveries performed in residency predict use in practice?

Authors:  Sasha E Andrews; Meredith J Alston; Amanda A Allshouse; Gaea S Moore; Torri D Metz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Evaluation of delivery options for second-stage events.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit; William A Grobman; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Uma M Reddy; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; George Saade; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Reducing caesarean rates in a public maternity hospital by implementing a plan of action: a quality improvement report.

Authors:  Romulo Negrini; Raquel Domingues da Silva Ferreira; Renata Silva Albino; Carol Amaral Tavares Daltro
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2020-05

Review 8.  Training and expertise in undertaking assisted vaginal delivery (AVD): a mixed methods systematic review of practitioners views and experiences.

Authors:  Claire Feeley; Nicola Crossland; Ana Pila Betran; Andrew Weeks; Soo Downe; Carol Kingdon
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.