Literature DB >> 25794629

Does the number of forceps deliveries performed in residency predict use in practice?

Sasha E Andrews1, Meredith J Alston2, Amanda A Allshouse3, Gaea S Moore1, Torri D Metz4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine whether a threshold number of forceps deliveries in residency predicts use of forceps in independent practice. STUDY
DESIGN: We surveyed obstetrics and gynecology residency graduates of 2 academic programs from 2008 through 2012 regarding the use of operative vaginal delivery in practice. At these programs, residents are trained in both forceps and vacuums. Individual case log data were obtained with the number of forceps deliveries performed by each respondent during residency. Respondents were grouped as currently using any forceps or vacuums alone. A logistic regression model estimated the probability of forceps use, predicted by the number of residency forceps deliveries. From the resulting receiver-operating characteristic curve, we assessed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and area under the curve.
RESULTS: The response rate was 85% (n = 58) and 90% (n = 52) practice obstetrics. Seventy-nine percent (n = 41) use forceps in practice. The mean number of forceps performed during residency was 22.3 ± 1.3 (mean ± SE) in the any-forceps group and 18.5 ± 2.1 in the vacuums-only group (P = .14). Although the model performed only moderately (area under the curve, 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.81), more than 13 residency forceps deliveries corresponded to a 95% sensitivity (95% CI, 84-99) and a positive predictive value of 83% (95% CI, 69-92) for using forceps in practice. The specificity of this threshold is 27% (95% CI, 6-61).
CONCLUSION: Although exceeding 13 forceps deliveries made it highly likely that obstetricians would use them in practice, further study is necessary to set goals for a number of resident forceps deliveries that translate into use in practice.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  forceps; operative vaginal delivery; residency training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25794629      PMCID: PMC4485574          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Forceps and vacuum delivery: expectations of residency and fellowship training program directors.

Authors:  G D Hankins; E Uckan; T F Rowe; S Collier
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Does forceps training on a birth simulator allow obstetricians to improve forceps blade placement?

Authors:  Olivier Dupuis; Evelyne Decullier; Jessica Clerc; Richard Moreau; Minh-Tu Pham; Sylvie Bin-Dorel; Xavier Brun; Michel Berland; Tanneguy Redarce
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Vacuum and forceps training in residency: experience and self-reported competency.

Authors:  J Powell; N Gilo; M Foote; K Gil; J P Lavin
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Increasing rates of operative vaginal delivery across two decades: accompanying outcomes and instrument preferences.

Authors:  Mark P Hehir; Fiona R Reidy; Michael N Wilkinson; Rhona Mahony
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Is surgical resident comfort level associated with experience?

Authors:  P Amy Suwanabol; Robert McDonald; Eugene Foley; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Trends over time with commonly performed obstetric and gynecologic inpatient procedures.

Authors:  Sallie S Oliphant; Keisha A Jones; Li Wang; Clareann H Bunker; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.661

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  How do pregnant women's perceptions of obstetric forceps change according to their demographic background: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Jasmine M Hitt; Angela S Martin; Jordan E Dietrich; Natasha Ahmed; Gene T Lee
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.