D A Crosby1, A Sarangapani2, A Simpson2, R Windrim2,3, A Satkunaratnam2,4, M F Higgins5. 1. UCD Perinatal Research Center, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 2. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 3. Maternal Fetal Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 4. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Canada. 5. UCD Perinatal Research Center, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, National Maternity Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. mary.higgins@ucd.ie.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess Irish and Canadian obstetricians in training ("trainees") experience, confidence, and comfort in performing operative vaginal delivery (OVD). STUDY DESIGN: Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the University of Toronto and the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey reviewing experience as primary operator of OVD. Trainee confidence and comfort was self-assessed based upon their last few OVDs. RESULTS: The response rate was 55% amongst Canadian trainees (31/56) and 44% amongst Irish trainees (21/48). When comparing Irish with Canadian trainee experience, the median numbers of vacuum and forceps deliveries performed by Irish trainees as primary operator were reported to be higher [125 (range 10-150) vs 20 (range 5-40); p < 0.0001 (ventouse), 45 (range 10-150) vs 6 (range 1-12); p = 0.0001 (forceps)]. Despite this, trainee confidence between the groups did not differ [confidence score: 18.7 (SD 3.2) vs 17.8 (SD 3.5), p = 0.3]. There were some differences regarding comfort in certain aspects of OVD, most notably increased comfort in Irish trainees in pre-procedure assessment skills of OVD. CONCLUSION: With falling OVD rates worldwide, training experience is declining. Despite higher numbers of OVD within the Irish trainee group, there was no difference in trainee confidence between the two groups. These results suggest that a high number of cases as primary operator may not be required to establish operator confidence in performing a procedure. Irish trainees self-reported more comfort in non-technical skills of OVD, suggesting a step-wise effect of experience on first technical and then non-technical skills.
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess Irish and Canadian obstetricians in training ("trainees") experience, confidence, and comfort in performing operative vaginal delivery (OVD). STUDY DESIGN: Trainees in Obstetrics and Gynaecology in the University of Toronto and the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland (RCPI) were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey reviewing experience as primary operator of OVD. Trainee confidence and comfort was self-assessed based upon their last few OVDs. RESULTS: The response rate was 55% amongst Canadian trainees (31/56) and 44% amongst Irish trainees (21/48). When comparing Irish with Canadian trainee experience, the median numbers of vacuum and forceps deliveries performed by Irish trainees as primary operator were reported to be higher [125 (range 10-150) vs 20 (range 5-40); p < 0.0001 (ventouse), 45 (range 10-150) vs 6 (range 1-12); p = 0.0001 (forceps)]. Despite this, trainee confidence between the groups did not differ [confidence score: 18.7 (SD 3.2) vs 17.8 (SD 3.5), p = 0.3]. There were some differences regarding comfort in certain aspects of OVD, most notably increased comfort in Irish trainees in pre-procedure assessment skills of OVD. CONCLUSION: With falling OVD rates worldwide, training experience is declining. Despite higher numbers of OVD within the Irish trainee group, there was no difference in trainee confidence between the two groups. These results suggest that a high number of cases as primary operator may not be required to establish operator confidence in performing a procedure. Irish trainees self-reported more comfort in non-technical skills of OVD, suggesting a step-wise effect of experience on first technical and then non-technical skills.
Authors: Ryan Hodges; Andrea Simpson; David Gurau; Michael Secter; Eva Mocarski; Richard Pittini; John Snelgrove; Rory Windrim; Mary Higgins Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Can Date: 2015-04
Authors: Hannah E Knight; Jan H van der Meulen; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Gordon C Smith; Amit Kiran; Steve Thornton; David Richmond; Alan Cameron; David A Cromwell Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Claire Feeley; Nicola Crossland; Ana Pila Betran; Andrew Weeks; Soo Downe; Carol Kingdon Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 3.223