Literature DB >> 1739144

Medicaid prenatal care: a comparison of use and outcomes in fee-for-service and managed care.

J W Krieger1, F A Connell, J P LoGerfo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To control rising costs, state Medicaid agencies are enrolling recipients in managed care health plans (MCPs). We performed this study to assess this policy's impact on accessibility and outcomes of Medicaid-funded prenatal care.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, controlled study with three cohorts: a study group of 1106 Medicaid recipients enrolled in three MCPs, a matched comparison group of 4830 recipients receiving care in the fee-for-service (FFS) system, and a second matched comparison group of 4434 non-Medicaid enrollees of the same MCPs. Data on prenatal care use and birth outcomes were obtained through linkage of claims and discharge files with birth certificate files.
RESULTS: Medicaid recipients enrolled in MCPs used prenatal care similarly to those in the FFS system and showed equal or modestly improved birth-weight distributions. However, Medicaid MCP enrollees showed poorer use of prenatal care and birth outcomes compared with non-Medicaid enrollees of the same plans.
CONCLUSIONS: Enrollment in MCPs has a neutral or small beneficial effect on the prenatal care received by the Medicaid population. However, providing financial access and modifying the system of care for this population did not result in parity with the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1739144      PMCID: PMC1694301          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.82.2.185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  38 in total

1.  Short interpregnancy interval and the risk of low birthweight.

Authors:  M A Klebanoff
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  An evaluation of Utah's primary care case management program for Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  S H Long; R F Settle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Incantations in the dark: Medicaid, managed care, and maternity care.

Authors:  S Rosenbaum; D Hughes; E Butler; D Howard
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  A typology of Medicaid managed care.

Authors:  R E Hurley; D A Freund
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Americans report on their access to health care.

Authors:  H E Freeman; R J Blendon; L H Aiken; S Sudman; C F Mullinix; C R Corey
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Assessing health quality--the case for tracers.

Authors:  D M Kessner; C E Kalk; J Singer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-01-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Health care for the indigent: overview of critical issues.

Authors:  G J Bazzoli
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Use of health care before and during Citicare.

Authors:  G S Bonham; G M Barber
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Managed care in Medicaid: selected issues in program origins, design, and research.

Authors:  D A Freund; R E Hurley
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 21.981

10.  Comparing the medical utilization and expenditures of low income health plan enrollees with Medicaid recipients and with low income enrollees having Medicaid eligibility.

Authors:  R E Johnson; D J Azevedo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  24 in total

1.  Medicaid and preterm births in Virginia: an analysis of recent outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Anum; Sheldon M Retchin; Sheryl L Garland; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Impact of the HealthChoice program on cesarean section and vaginal birth after C-section deliveries: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Arpit Misra
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-06-05

3.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

Authors:  B Blondel; B Marshall
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Obstetric care and payment source: do low-risk Medicaid women get less care?

Authors:  S Dobie; L G Hart; M Fordyce; C H Andrilla; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A comparison of capitated and fee-for-service Medicaid reimbursement methods on pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  D M Oleske; M L Branca; J B Schmidt; R Ferguson; E S Linn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Primary care case management and birth outcomes in the Iowa Medicaid program.

Authors:  E D Schulman; D J Sheriff; E T Momany
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Use of social services by pregnant Medicaid eligible women in Baltimore.

Authors:  C S Minkovitz; A K Duggan; M H Fox; M H Wilson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1999-09

9.  Selection bias in prenatal care use by Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-12

10.  Impact of financial incentives for prenatal care on birth outcomes and spending.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Zhonghe Li; Audra D Robertson; Arnold Milstein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.