Literature DB >> 20831442

Medicaid and preterm births in Virginia: an analysis of recent outcomes.

Emmanuel A Anum1, Sheldon M Retchin, Sheryl L Garland, Jerome F Strauss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study objectives were to evaluate adequacy of prenatal care and risk for preterm birth among Medicaid clients in Virginia and to determine if payment method is associated with the risk of preterm birth.
METHODS: Birth certificate data for the Commonwealth of Virginia for 2007 and 2008 were linked with Medicaid claims data. Analysis was limited to singleton births. Three payment methods were evaluated: private insurance, self-pay, and Medicaid. The prevalence of preterm birth for each level of prenatal care defined by the Kotelchuck prenatal care index was assessed for each payment method. Unconditional logistic regression modeling was used to assess the association between payment method and preterm birth risk while controlling for known preterm birth risk factors.
RESULTS: Preterm birth prevalences (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the different payment methods were 7.9% (4.79-8.07) for the privately insured, 10.1% (9.57-10.60) for the self-pay group, and 10.2% (9.95-10.45) for Medicaid recipients. Compared with those with private insurance, women on Medicaid had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) for preterm birth (95% CI) of 0.99 (0.94-1.03). Self-pay mothers had a 32% increase in the odds of preterm birth relative to the privately insured. All payment groups show a trend toward significant reduction in preterm birth prevalence as adequacy of prenatal care improved from inadequate to adequate. Medicaid enrollees had a high prevalence of known risk factors, including smoking and illicit drug use and cervical insufficiency.
CONCLUSIONS: When known risk factors have been controlled, preterm birth risk for Medicaid enrollees did not differ significantly from the privately insured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20831442      PMCID: PMC2971635          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2010.1955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  30 in total

1.  Transitions in insurance coverage from before pregnancy through delivery in nine states, 1996-1999.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Norma I Gavin; Arden Handler; Will Manning; Cheryl Raskind-Hood
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The role of public insurance and the public delivery system in improving birth outcomes for low-income pregnant women.

Authors:  M Susan Marquis; Stephen H Long
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  The impact of the Medicaid expansions for pregnant women: a synthesis of the evidence.

Authors:  E M Howell
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Prepaid versus traditional Medicaid plans: lack of effect on pregnancy outcomes and prenatal care.

Authors:  T S Carey; K Weis; C Homer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Medicaid maternal and child health care: prepaid plans vs. private fee-for-service.

Authors:  J Reis
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Selection bias in prenatal care use by Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-12

7.  Risk status and pregnancy outcome among medicaid recipients.

Authors:  B Schwethelm; L H Margolis; C Miller; S Smith
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Impact of a mandatory Medicaid case management program on prenatal care and birth outcomes. A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  N I Goldfarb; A L Hillman; J M Eisenberg; M A Kelley; A V Cohen; M Dellheim
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  Allison S Bryant; Ayaba Worjoloh; Aaron B Caughey; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Evaluation of the Medicaid competition demonstrations.

Authors:  D A Freund; L F Rossiter; P D Fox; J A Meyer; R E Hurley; T S Carey; J E Paul
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989
View more
  5 in total

1.  A comparison of approaches to identify live births using the medicaid analytic extract.

Authors:  Sara E Heins; Laura J Faherty; Ashley M Kranz
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2021-05-26

2.  Racial disparities in economic and clinical outcomes of pregnancy among Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Shun Zhang; Kathryn Cardarelli; Ruth Shim; Jiali Ye; Karla L Booker; George Rust
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-10

3.  Role of perceived stress in the occurrence of preterm labor and preterm birth among urban women.

Authors:  Laura Seravalli; Freda Patterson; Deborah B Nelson
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Characterizing Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Medicaid Recipients in a Nonexpansion State.

Authors:  Matthew D Moore; Sara E Mazzoni; Martha S Wingate; Janet M Bronstein
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Prospective longitudinal study of the pregnancy DNA methylome: the US Pregnancy, Race, Environment, Genes (PREG) study.

Authors:  Dana M Lapato; Sara Moyer; Emily Olivares; Ananda B Amstadter; Patricia A Kinser; Shawn J Latendresse; Colleen Jackson-Cook; Roxann Roberson-Nay; Jerome F Strauss; Timothy P York
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.