Literature DB >> 17390727

Cell cycle-related bystander responses are not increased with LET after heavy-ion irradiation.

C Fournier1, D Becker, M Winter, P Barberet, M Heiss, B Fischer, J Topsch, G Taucher-Scholz.   

Abstract

Evidence has accumulated that irradiated cells affect their unirradiated neighbors, so that they in turn display cellular responses typically associated with direct radiation exposure. These responses are generally known as bystander effects. In this study, cell cycle-related bystander responses were investigated in three strains of human fibroblasts after exposure to densely ionizing radiation. Varying the linear energy transfer (LET) from 11 to 15,000 keV microm(-1) allowed a study of the impact of the complexity of DNA damage in the inducing cells on the responses of bystander cells. Using both broad-beam and microbeam irradiation, transient bystander responses were obtained for the induction of CDKN1A (p21). The latter was also observed when the transmission of bystander signals was limited to soluble factors. Targeted irradiation of single cells in confluent cell monolayers revealed no correlation between the amount of CDKN1A protein in the bystander cells and the radial distance to the targeted cells. In line with the induction of CDKN1A in bystander cells after irradiation with different LETs, a transient delay in the first G1 phase after irradiation of G0/G1 cells was observed. However, the CDKN1A induction revealed no significant effect on premature terminal differentiation considered to underlie fibrosis in irradiated tissue. Thus the unchanged differentiation pattern in bystander cells does not indicate pronounced, long-lasting effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17390727     DOI: 10.1667/rr0760.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  11 in total

Review 1.  Health risks of space exploration: targeted and nontargeted oxidative injury by high-charge and high-energy particles.

Authors:  Min Li; Géraldine Gonon; Manuela Buonanno; Narongchai Autsavapromporn; Sonia M de Toledo; Debkumar Pain; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Long-term consequences of radiation-induced bystander effects depend on radiation quality and dose and correlate with oxidative stress.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Sonia M de Toledo; Debkumar Pain; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Detection of chromosomal instability in bystander cells after Si490-ion irradiation.

Authors:  Brian Ponnaiya; Masao Suzuki; Chirzuru Tsuruoka; Yukio Uchihori; Ying Wei; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Crosstalk between telomere maintenance and radiation effects: A key player in the process of radiation-induced carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Grace Shim; Michelle Ricoul; William M Hempel; Edouard I Azzam; Laure Sabatier
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.657

5.  Bystander effect in tumor cells produced by Iodine-125 labeled human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Omar Mamlouk; Pichumani Balagurumoorthy; Ketai Wang; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 6.  Microbeam studies of the bystander response.

Authors:  Kevin M Prise; Giuseppe Schettino; Boris Vojnovic; Oleg Belyakov; Chunlin Shao
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.724

7.  Propagation distance of the alpha-particle-induced bystander effect: the role of nuclear traversal and gap junction communication.

Authors:  Sylvain Gaillard; David Pusset; Sonia M de Toledo; Michel Fromm; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Nontargeted stressful effects in normal human fibroblast cultures exposed to low fluences of high charge, high energy (HZE) particles: kinetics of biologic responses and significance of secondary radiations.

Authors:  Géraldine Gonon; Jean-Emmanuel Groetz; Sonia M de Toledo; Roger W Howell; Michel Fromm; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Induction of Non-Targeted Stress Responses in Mammary Tissues by Heavy Ions.

Authors:  Tony J C Wang; Cheng-Chia Wu; Yunfei Chai; Roy K K Lam; Nobuyuki Hamada; Shizuko Kakinuma; Yukio Uchihori; Peter K N Yu; Tom K Hei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  MRC5 and QU-DB bystander cells can produce bystander factors and induce radiation bystander effect.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Bahreyni Toossi; Shokoufeh Mohebbi; Roghayeh Kamran Samani; Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2014-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.