Literature DB >> 21319986

Long-term consequences of radiation-induced bystander effects depend on radiation quality and dose and correlate with oxidative stress.

Manuela Buonanno1, Sonia M de Toledo, Debkumar Pain, Edouard I Azzam.   

Abstract

Widespread evidence indicates that exposure of cell populations to ionizing radiation results in significant biological changes in both the irradiated and nonirradiated bystander cells in the population. We investigated the role of radiation quality, or linear energy transfer (LET), and radiation dose in the propagation of stressful effects in the progeny of bystander cells. Confluent normal human cell cultures were exposed to low or high doses of 1GeV/u iron ions (LET ∼ 151 keV/µm), 600 MeV/u silicon ions (LET ∼ 51 keV/µm), or 1 GeV protons (LET ∼ 0.2 keV/µm). Within minutes after irradiation, the cells were trypsinized and co-cultured with nonirradiated cells for 5 h. During this time, irradiated and nonirradiated cells were grown on either side of an insert with 3-µm pores. Nonirradiated cells were then harvested and allowed to grow for 20 generations. Relative to controls, the progeny of bystander cells that were co-cultured with cells irradiated with iron or silicon ions, but not protons, exhibited reduced cloning efficiency and harbored higher levels of chromosomal damage, protein oxidation and lipid peroxidation. This correlated with decreased activity of antioxidant enzymes, inactivation of the redox-sensitive metabolic enzyme aconitase, and altered translation of proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA. Together, the results demonstrate that the long-term consequences of the induced nontargeted effects greatly depend on the quality and dose of the radiation and involve persistent oxidative stress due to induced perturbations in oxidative metabolism. They are relevant to estimates of health risks from exposures to space radiation and the emergence of second malignancies after radiotherapy.
© 2011 by Radiation Research Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21319986      PMCID: PMC3106980          DOI: 10.1667/RR2461.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  60 in total

1.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 2.  Carbon ion radiotherapy: clinical experiences at National Institute of Radiological Science (NIRS).

Authors:  Tohru Okada; Tadashi Kamada; Hiroshi Tsuji; Jun-etsu Mizoe; Masayuki Baba; Shingo Kato; Shigeru Yamada; Shinji Sugahara; Shigeo Yasuda; Naoyoshi Yamamoto; Reiko Imai; Azusa Hasegawa; Hiroshi Imada; Hiroki Kiyohara; Kenichi Jingu; Makoto Shinoto; Hirohiko Tsujii
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 3.  Biological characteristics of carbon-ion therapy.

Authors:  Koichi Ando; Yuki Kase
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Analysis of proteins synthesized in mitochondria of cultured mammalian cells. An assessment of current approaches and problems in interpretation.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; I W Craig
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1976-09

5.  Low-dose irradiation alters the transcript profiles of human lymphoblastoid cells including genes associated with cytogenetic radioadaptive response.

Authors:  Matthew A Coleman; Eric Yin; Leif E Peterson; David Nelson; Karen Sorensen; James D Tucker; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Measurement of micronuclei in lymphocytes.

Authors:  M Fenech; A A Morley
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Nuclear genes and mitochondrial translation: a new class of genetic disease.

Authors:  Howard T Jacobs; Douglass M Turnbull
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome.

Authors:  S Anderson; A T Bankier; B G Barrell; M H de Bruijn; A R Coulson; J Drouin; I C Eperon; D P Nierlich; B A Roe; F Sanger; P H Schreier; A J Smith; R Staden; I G Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Spatial learning and memory deficits induced by exposure to iron-56-particle radiation.

Authors:  B Shukitt-Hale; G Casadesus; J J McEwen; B M Rabin; J A Joseph
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  The role of gap junction communication and oxidative stress in the propagation of toxic effects among high-dose α-particle-irradiated human cells.

Authors:  Narongchai Autsavapromporn; Sonia M de Toledo; John B Little; Jean-Paul Jay-Gerin; Andrew L Harris; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 2.841

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  Health risks of space exploration: targeted and nontargeted oxidative injury by high-charge and high-energy particles.

Authors:  Min Li; Géraldine Gonon; Manuela Buonanno; Narongchai Autsavapromporn; Sonia M de Toledo; Debkumar Pain; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  Detection of chromosomal instability in bystander cells after Si490-ion irradiation.

Authors:  Brian Ponnaiya; Masao Suzuki; Chirzuru Tsuruoka; Yukio Uchihori; Ying Wei; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Lack of reliability in the disruption of cognitive performance following exposure to protons.

Authors:  Bernard M Rabin; Nicholas A Heroux; Barbara Shukitt-Hale; Kirsty L Carrihill-Knoll; Zachary Beck; Chelsea Baxter
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-05-03       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Radiation-Induced Bystander Response: Mechanism and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Keiji Suzuki; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Functional consequences of radiation-induced oxidative stress in cultured neural stem cells and the brain exposed to charged particle irradiation.

Authors:  Bertrand P Tseng; Erich Giedzinski; Atefeh Izadi; Tatiana Suarez; Mary L Lan; Katherine K Tran; Munjal M Acharya; Gregory A Nelson; Jacob Raber; Vipan K Parihar; Charles L Limoli
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 8.401

6.  Bystander effects and compartmental stress response to X-ray irradiation in L929 cells.

Authors:  Mihaela Temelie; Daniela Stroe; Ileana Petcu; Cosmin Mustaciosu; Nicoleta Moisoi; Diana Savu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 7.  Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.

Authors:  Deepa M Sridharan; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Steve R Blattnig; Sylvain V Costes; Paul W Doetsch; William S Dynan; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Yared Kidane; Amy Kronenberg; Mamta D Naidu; Leif E Peterson; Ianik Plante; Artem L Ponomarev; Janapriya Saha; Antoine M Snijders; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Jonathan Tang; Erica Werner; Janice M Pluth
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-21

8.  A single low dose of Fe ions can cause long-term biological responses in NL20 human bronchial epithelial cells.

Authors:  Qianlin Cao; Wei Liu; Jingdong Wang; Jianping Cao; Hongying Yang
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Biological effects in normal cells exposed to FLASH dose rate protons.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Veljko Grilj; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Metabolomic profiling of urine samples from mice exposed to protons reveals radiation quality and dose specific differences.

Authors:  Evagelia C Laiakis; Daniela Trani; Bo-Hyun Moon; Steven J Strawn; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.