Literature DB >> 19580486

Propagation distance of the alpha-particle-induced bystander effect: the role of nuclear traversal and gap junction communication.

Sylvain Gaillard1, David Pusset, Sonia M de Toledo, Michel Fromm, Edouard I Azzam.   

Abstract

When cell populations are exposed to low-dose alpha-particle radiation, a significant fraction of the cells will not be traversed by a radiation track. However, stressful effects occur in both irradiated and bystander cells in the population. Characterizing these effects, and investigating their underlying mechanism(s), is critical to understanding human health risks associated with exposure to alpha particles. To this end, confluent normal human fibroblast cultures were grown on polyethylene terephthalate foil grafted to an ultrathin solid-state nuclear track detector and exposed under non-perturbing conditions to low-fluence alpha particles from a broadbeam irradiator. Irradiated and affected bystander cells were localized with micrometer precision. The stress-responsive protein p21(Waf1) (also known as CDKN1A) was induced in bystander cells within a 100-microm radius from an irradiated cell. The mean propagation distance ranged from 20 to 40 microm around the intranuclear alpha-particle impact point, which corresponds to a set of approximately 30 cells. Nuclear traversal, induced DNA damage, and gap junction communication were critical contributors to propagation of this stressful effect. The strategy described here may be ideal to investigate the size of radiation-affected target and the relative contribution of different cellular organelles to bystander effects induced by energetic particles, which is relevant to radioprotection and cancer radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19580486      PMCID: PMC2717798          DOI: 10.1667/RR1658.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  34 in total

1.  Induction of a bystander mutagenic effect of alpha particles in mammalian cells.

Authors:  H Zhou; G Randers-Pehrson; C A Waldren; D Vannais; E J Hall; T K Hei
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis: II. A quantitative model.

Authors:  D J Brenner; J B Little; R K Sachs
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms.

Authors:  M Pollycove; L E Feinendegen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects.

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Genomic instability and bystander effects: a historical perspective.

Authors:  John B Little
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Free radical-initiated and gap junction-mediated bystander effect due to nonuniform distribution of incorporated radioactivity in a three-dimensional tissue culture model.

Authors:  A Bishayee; H Z Hill; D Stein; D V Rao; R W Howell
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Oxidative metabolism modulates signal transduction and micronucleus formation in bystander cells from alpha-particle-irradiated normal human fibroblast cultures.

Authors:  Edouard I Azzam; Sonia M De Toledo; Douglas R Spitz; John B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Bystander effect produced by radiolabeled tumor cells in vivo.

Authors:  Lanny Y Xue; Nicholas J Butler; G Mike Makrigiorgos; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Low dose radiation and intercellular induction of apoptosis: potential implications for the control of oncogenesis.

Authors:  Georg Bauer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  20 in total

1.  Effect of site-specific bronchial radon progeny deposition on the spatial and temporal distributions of cellular responses.

Authors:  Arpád Farkas; Werner Hofmann; Imre Balásházy; István Szoke; Balázs G Madas; Mona Moustafa
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Long-term consequences of radiation-induced bystander effects depend on radiation quality and dose and correlate with oxidative stress.

Authors:  Manuela Buonanno; Sonia M de Toledo; Debkumar Pain; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Micro RNA responses to chronic or acute exposures to low dose ionizing radiation.

Authors:  M Ahmad Chaudhry; Romaica A Omaruddin; Bridget Kreger; Sonia M de Toledo; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.316

4.  Practical implications of nanodosimetry in medicine.

Authors:  Jahangir A Satti
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Crosstalk between telomere maintenance and radiation effects: A key player in the process of radiation-induced carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Grace Shim; Michelle Ricoul; William M Hempel; Edouard I Azzam; Laure Sabatier
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.657

6.  Dose-Dependent Growth Delay of Breast Cancer Xenografts in the Bone Marrow of Mice Treated with 223Ra: The Role of Bystander Effects and Their Potential for Therapy.

Authors:  Calvin N Leung; Brian S Canter; Didier Rajon; Tom A Bäck; J Christopher Fritton; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

8.  Intercellular communication amplifies stressful effects in high-charge, high-energy (HZE) particle-irradiated human cells.

Authors:  Narongchai Autsavapromporn; Sonia M De Toledo; Manuela Buonanno; Jean-Paul Jay-Gerin; Andrew L Harris; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.724

9.  Gap junction communication and the propagation of bystander effects induced by microbeam irradiation in human fibroblast cultures: the impact of radiation quality.

Authors:  Narongchai Autsavapromporn; Masao Suzuki; Tomoo Funayama; Noriko Usami; Ianik Plante; Yuichiro Yokota; Yasuko Mutou; Hiroko Ikeda; Katsumi Kobayashi; Yasuhiko Kobayashi; Yukio Uchihori; Tom K Hei; Edouard I Azzam; Takeshi Murakami
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Nontargeted stressful effects in normal human fibroblast cultures exposed to low fluences of high charge, high energy (HZE) particles: kinetics of biologic responses and significance of secondary radiations.

Authors:  Géraldine Gonon; Jean-Emmanuel Groetz; Sonia M de Toledo; Roger W Howell; Michel Fromm; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.841

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.