Literature DB >> 1738844

On the probability of matching DNA fingerprints.

N J Risch1, B Devlin.   

Abstract

Forensic scientists commonly assume that DNA fingerprint patterns are infrequent in the general population and that genotypes are independent across loci. To test these assumptions, the number of matching DNA patterns in two large databases from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and from Lifecodes was determined. No deviation from independence across loci in either database was apparent. For the Lifecodes database, the probability of a three-locus match ranges from 1 in 6,233 in Caucasians to 1 in 119,889 in Blacks. When considering all trios of five loci in the FBI database, there was only a single match observed out of more than 7.6 million comparisons. If independence is assumed, the probability of a five-locus match ranged from 1.32 x 10(-12) in Southeast Hispanics to 5.59 x 10(-14) in Blacks, implying that the minimum number of possible patterns for each ethnic group is several orders of magnitude greater than their corresponding population sizes in the United States. The most common five-locus pattern can have a frequency no greater than about 10(-6). Hence, individual five-locus DNA profiles are extremely uncommon, if not unique.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1738844     DOI: 10.1126/science.1738844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  24 in total

1.  Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations.

Authors:  D E Krane; R W Allen; S A Sawyer; D A Petrov; D L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The ceiling principle is not always conservative in assigning genotype frequencies for forensic DNA testing.

Authors:  J E Cohen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Allelic structure and distribution of 103 STR loci in a Southern Tunisian population.

Authors:  Abdellatif Maalej; Ahmed Rebai; Adnen Ayadi; Jomaa Jouida; Hafedh Makni; Hammadi Ayadi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  High MHC diversity maintained by balancing selection in an otherwise genetically monomorphic mammal.

Authors:  Andres Aguilar; Gary Roemer; Sally Debenham; Matthew Binns; David Garcelon; Robert K Wayne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Relatedness measured by oligonucleotide probe DNA fingerprints and an estimate of the mating system of Sea Lavender (Limonium carolinianum).

Authors:  M B Hamilton; D M Rand
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  A Dutch population study of the STR Loci HUMTHO1, HUMFES/FPS, HUMVWA31/1 and HUMF13A1, conducted for forensic purposes.

Authors:  M Sjerps; N van der Geest; C Pieron; M Gajadhar; A Kloosterman
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Short alleles revealed by PCR demonstrate no heterozygote deficiency at minisatellite loci D1S7, D7S21, and D12S11.

Authors:  S Alonso; A Castro; I Fernández-Fernández; M M de Pancorbo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  A Dutch population study of the STR loci D21S11 and HUMFIBRA.

Authors:  A Ovington; P Daselaar; M Sjerps; A Kloosterman
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  Dutch Caucasian population data on the loci LDLR, GYPA, HBGG, D7S8, and GC.

Authors:  A D Kloosterman; M Sjerps; D Wust
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.