Literature DB >> 1438254

Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations.

D E Krane1, R W Allen, S A Sawyer, D A Petrov, D L Hartl.   

Abstract

Highly polymorphic segments of the human genome containing variable numbers of tandem repeats (VNTRs) have been widely used to establish DNA profiles of individuals for use in forensics. Methods of estimating the probability of occurrence of matching DNA profiles between two randomly selected individuals have been subject to extensive debate regarding the possibility of significant substructure occurring within the major races. We have sampled two Caucasian subpopulations, Finns and Italians, at four commonly used VNTR loci to determine the extent to which the subgroups differ from each other and from a mixed Caucasian database. The data were also analyzed for the occurrence of linkage disequilibrium among the loci. The allele frequency distributions of some loci were found to differ significantly among the subpopulations in a manner consistent with population substructure. Major differences were also found in the probability of occurrence of matching DNA profiles between two individuals chosen at random from the same subpopulation. With respect to the Finnish and Italian subpopulations, the conventional product rule for estimating the probability of a multilocus VNTR match using a mixed Caucasian database consistently yields estimates that are artificially small. Systematic errors of this type were not found using the interim ceiling principle recently advocated in the National Research Council's report [National Research Council (1992) DNA Technology in Forensic Science (Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington)]. The interim ceiling principle is based on currently available racial or ethnic databases and sets an arbitrary lower limit on each VNTR allele frequency. In the future the ceiling frequencies are expected to be established from more adequate data acquired for relevant VNTR loci from multiple subpopulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1438254      PMCID: PMC50385          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.10583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  21 in total

1.  Independence of VNTR alleles defined as fixed bins.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  DNA fingerprint matches.

Authors:  P J Sullivan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-06-26       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons.

Authors:  B Budowle; A M Giusti; J S Waye; F S Baechtel; R M Fourney; D E Adams; L A Presley; H A Deadman; K L Monson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Research on DNA typing catching up with courtroom application.

Authors:  E S Lander
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A population genetic study of six VNTR loci in three ethnically defined populations.

Authors:  R Deka; R Chakroborty; R E Ferrell
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.736

6.  Response.

Authors:  R C Lewontin; D L Hartl
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; S L Thein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jul 4-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Variable number of tandem repeat (VNTR) markers for human gene mapping.

Authors:  Y Nakamura; M Leppert; P O'Connell; R Wolff; T Holm; M Culver; C Martin; E Fujimoto; M Hoff; E Kumlin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  "A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity". Addendum.

Authors:  A P Feinberg; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 10.  Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.

Authors:  D Botstein; R L White; M Skolnick; R W Davis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  10 in total

1.  A maximum-likelihood method for the estimation of pairwise relatedness in structured populations.

Authors:  Amy D Anderson; Bruce S Weir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  DNA fingerprinting loci do show population differences: comments on Budowle et al.

Authors:  S Sawyer; A Podleski; D Krane; D Hartl
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Large scale database experiments to assess the significance of matching DNA profiles.

Authors:  J A Lambert; J K Scranage; I W Evett
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity.

Authors:  D J Balding; R A Nichols
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Inference of population subdivision from the VNTR distributions of New Zealanders.

Authors:  A G Clark; J F Hamilton; G K Chambers
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Population genetics of the HRAS1 minisatellite locus.

Authors:  B Devlin; T Krontiris; N Risch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Comparison of VNTR allele frequencies and inclusion probabilities over six populations.

Authors:  G T Duncan; K Noppinger; J Carey; M Tracey
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  A reassessment of frequency estimates of PvuII-generated VNTR profiles in a Finnish, an Italian, and a general U.S. Caucasian database: no evidence for ethnic subgroups affecting forensic estimates.

Authors:  B Budowle; K L Monson; A M Giusti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Likelihood ratios for DNA identification.

Authors:  A Collins; N E Morton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Evaluating methods to correct for population stratification when estimating paternity indexes.

Authors:  Ulises Toscanini; Manuel Garcia-Magariños; Gabriela Berardi; Thore Egeland; Eduardo Raimondi; Antonio Salas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.