Literature DB >> 17387479

Radiation dose and risk from fluoroscopically guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting in the abdominal region.

John Stratakis1, John Damilakis, Dimitrios Tsetis, Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the radiation dose and associated risks resulting from fluoroscopically guided percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stent placement in the abdominal region. Average examination parameters for renal and aortoiliac procedures were derived using data from 80 consecutive procedures performed in our institute. Organ and effective doses were estimated for endovascular procedures with the use of a Monte Carlo (MC) transport code and an adult mathematical phantom. Thermoluminescent dosimeters were used in an anthropomorphic phantom to verify MC calculations. Radiation-induced risks were estimated. Results are presented as doses normalized to dose area product, so that the patient dose from any technique and X-ray unit can be easily calculated for iliac and renal PTA/stenting sessions. The average effective dose varied from 75 to 371 microSv per Gycm(2) depending on the beam quality, procedure scheme and sex of the patient. Differences up to 17% were observed between MC-calculated data and data derived from thermoluminescent dosimetry. The radiation-induced cancer risk may be considerable for younger individuals undergoing transluminal angioplasty with stent placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17387479     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0632-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  25 in total

1.  Diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology.

Authors:  N W Marshall; C L Chapple; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Guidelines for peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity vessels. A statement for health professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Arteriosclerosis, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention, the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Michael J Pentecost; Michael H Criqui; Gerald Dorros; Jerry Goldstone; K Wayne Johnston; Eric C Martin; Ernest J Ring; James B Spies
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Radiation-induced temporary hair loss as a radiation damage only occurring in patients who had the combination of MDCT and DSA.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Imanishi; Atsushi Fukui; Hiroshi Niimi; Daisuke Itoh; Kyouko Nozaki; Shunsuke Nakaji; Kumiko Ishizuka; Hitoshi Tabata; Yu Furuya; Masahiko Uzura; Hideto Takahama; Suzuo Hashizume; Shiro Arima; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Effective doses in angiography and interventional radiology: calculation of conversion coefficients for angiography of the lower limbs.

Authors:  L Struelens; F Vanhavere; H Bosmans; R Van Loon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The use of angioplasty, bypass surgery, and amputation in the management of peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  S R Tunis; E B Bass; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  [Program for calculating diagnostic x-ray spectra].

Authors:  R Nowotny; A Höfer
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1985-06

7.  Management of renal artery stenosis: effects of a shift from surgical to percutaneous therapy on indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Peter J Mackrell; Eugene M Langan; Timothy M Sullivan; Bruce H Gray; Spence M Taylor; David L Cull; Bruce A Snyder; Jerry R Youkey; Christopher G Carsten
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 1.466

8.  Monte Carlo calculations for assessment of radiation dose to patients with congenital heart defects and to staff during cardiac catheterizations.

Authors:  F W Schultz; J Geleijns; F M Spoelstra; J Zoetelief
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Patient dose values in interventional radiology.

Authors:  E Vañó; L González; J M Fernández; E Guibelalde
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Entrance skin dose estimates derived from dose-area product measurements in interventional radiological procedures.

Authors:  B J McParland
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  4 in total

1.  Investigation of reference levels and radiation dose associated with abdominal EVAR (endovascular aneurysm repair) procedures across several European Centres.

Authors:  E Tuthill; L O'Hora; M O'Donohoe; S Panci; P Gilligan; D Campion; R Trenti; E Fox; D Catania; L Rainford
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Accuracy of multislice CT angiography for the assessment of in-stent restenoses in the iliac arteries at reduced dose: a phantom study.

Authors:  K Perisinakis; E Manousaki; K Zourari; D Tsetis; A Tzedakis; A Papadakis; A Karantanas; J Damilakis
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  [Patient information and informed consent in interventional radiology].

Authors:  M Marschner; C Stroszczynski
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Comparison of radiation dose exposure in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention vs. peripheral intervention.

Authors:  Salech Arif; Stanislaw Bartus; Tomasz Rakowski; Beata Bobrowska; Joanna Rutka; Anna Zabowka; Tomasz Tokarek; Dariusz Dudek; Jacek Dubiel
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 1.426

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.