Literature DB >> 17368708

Sensitivity to biological motion drops by approximately 1/2 log-unit with inversion, and is unaffected by amblyopia.

Peter Neri1, Jennifer Y Luu, Dennis M Levi.   

Abstract

The low-level deficits associated with amblyopia have been studied extensively, but very little is known about potential impairments to higher-level visual processing such as object recognition or structure-from-motion. Studies on biological motion, a complex form of structure-from-motion depicting human actions, have demonstrated that normal observers can analyze these patterns more effectively when they are shown in their original upright configuration as opposed to inverted upside-down (feet-up head-down). We measured this inversion effect quantitatively for both the dominant and amblyopic eyes of amblyopic observers. We found a modest ( approximately 30%) loss in sensitivity in the amblyopic eye for both upright and inverted actors, which we attribute to low-level deficits. However, we found no difference in the inversion effect between the two eyes, both showing an average 1/2 log-unit drop in sensitivity between upright and inverted displays. Our data provide a quantitative estimate of the inversion effect for biological motion, and demonstrate that higher-level processing in the motion hierarchy is not affected by amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17368708      PMCID: PMC1907584          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  33 in total

1.  Orientation specificity in biological motion perception.

Authors:  M Pavlova; A Sokolov
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-07

Review 2.  Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements.

Authors:  Martin A Giese; Tomaso Poggio
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia.

Authors:  Anita J Simmers; Tim Ledgeway; Robert F Hess; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision?

Authors:  Duje Tadin; Joseph S Lappin; Randolph Blake; Emily D Grossman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Is the ability to identify deviations in multiple trajectories compromised by amblyopia?

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Srimant P Tripathy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  On the effective number of tracked trajectories in amblyopic human vision.

Authors:  Srimant P Tripathy; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Functional neuroanatomy of biological motion perception in humans.

Authors:  L M Vaina; J Solomon; S Chowdhury; P Sinha; J W Belliveau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Visual recognition of biological motion is impaired in children with autism.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Lauren M Turner; Moria J Smoski; Stacie L Pozdol; Wendy L Stone
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-03

9.  Perception of the symmetrical patterning of human gait by infants.

Authors:  Amy E Booth; Bennett I Bertenthal; Jeannine Pinto
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2002-07

10.  Perception of biological motion in parietal patients.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Patrick Cavanagh; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  6 in total

1.  Insights into social perception in autism.

Authors:  Punit Shah; Sophie Sowden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Action perception is intact in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  James P Cusack; Justin H G Williams; Peter Neri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Sensitivity to synchronicity of biological motion in normal and amblyopic vision.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Luu; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Global processing in amblyopia: a review.

Authors:  Lisa M Hamm; Joanna Black; Shuan Dai; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

5.  Wholes and subparts in visual processing of human agency.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Motion perception: a review of developmental changes and the role of early visual experience.

Authors:  Batsheva Hadad; Sivan Schwartz; Daphne Maurer; Terri L Lewis
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.