Literature DB >> 12219092

What constitutes an efficient reference frame for vision?

Duje Tadin1, Joseph S Lappin, Randolph Blake, Emily D Grossman.   

Abstract

Vision requires a reference frame. To what extent does this reference frame depend on the structure of the visual input, rather than just on retinal landmarks? This question is particularly relevant to the perception of dynamic scenes, when keeping track of external motion relative to the retina is difficult. We tested human subjects' ability to discriminate the motion and temporal coherence of changing elements that were embedded in global patterns and whose perceptual organization was manipulated in a way that caused only minor changes to the retinal image. Coherence discriminations were always better when local elements were perceived to be organized as a global moving form than when they were perceived to be unorganized, individually moving entities. Our results indicate that perceived form influences the neural representation of its component features, and from this, we propose a new method for studying perceptual organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12219092      PMCID: PMC4613799          DOI: 10.1038/nn914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  39 in total

1.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites.

Authors:  P Cavanagh; A T Labianca; I M Thornton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-06

Review 2.  Coordinate transformations for eye and arm movements in the brain.

Authors:  L H Snyder
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Coherence of early motion signals.

Authors:  J S Lappin; M P Donnelly; H Kojima
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure.

Authors:  S H Lee; R Blake
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Eye movements affect the perceived speed of visual motion.

Authors:  K A Turano; S M Heidenreich
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Felleman; D C Van Essen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  False perception of motion in a patient who cannot compensate for eye movements.

Authors:  T Haarmeier; P Thier; M Repnow; D Petersen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Spatial and temporal coherence in perceptual binding.

Authors:  R Blake; Y Yang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Reduction or disappearance of visual after effect of movement in the absence of patterned surround.

Authors:  R H Day; E Strelow
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Relative motion induced between stationary lines.

Authors:  K Nakayama; C W Tyler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  15 in total

1.  Observing human movements helps decoding environmental forces.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Barbara La Scaleia; William L Miller; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual motion detection in hierarchical spatial frames of reference.

Authors:  Alexander Sokolov; Marina Pavlova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Distinct neural mechanisms for body form and body motion discriminations.

Authors:  Joris Vangeneugden; Marius V Peelen; Duje Tadin; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Suppressive mechanisms in visual motion processing: From perception to intelligence.

Authors:  Duje Tadin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Sensitivity to biological motion drops by approximately 1/2 log-unit with inversion, and is unaffected by amblyopia.

Authors:  Peter Neri; Jennifer Y Luu; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Shadows remain segmented as selectable regions in object-based attention paradigms.

Authors:  Lee de-Wit; David Milner; Robert Kentridge
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-03-05

7.  Tempo rubato : animacy speeds up time in the brain.

Authors:  Mauro Carrozzo; Alessandro Moscatelli; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Investigating the status of biological stimuli as objects of attention in multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Lee H de-Wit; Carmen E Lefevre; Robert W Kentridge; Geraint Rees; Ayse P Saygin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Integrating biological motion: the role of grouping in the perception of point-light actions.

Authors:  Ervin Poljac; Karl Verfaillie; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Understanding attentional modulation of binocular rivalry: a framework based on biased competition.

Authors:  Kevin Conrad Dieter; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.