Literature DB >> 18484847

On the effective number of tracked trajectories in amblyopic human vision.

Srimant P Tripathy1, Dennis M Levi.   

Abstract

We estimated the effective number of trajectories that amblyopic observers could track with their amblyopic eyes and their non-amblyopic eyes using stimuli and methods described in S. P. Tripathy, S. Narasimhan, and B. T. Barrett (2007). The stimuli consisted of dots moving along straight-line trajectories. In Experiment 1, one of the T trajectories (the target) deviated clockwise or counterclockwise by +/-19 degrees , +/-38 degrees , or +/-76 degrees , halfway through the trajectory. In Experiment 2, D of the T trajectories deviated, all in the same direction and with the same magnitude of direction change. In both experiments, we varied T and the angle of deviation. In Experiment 2, we also varied D. Amblyopic observers reported the direction of deviation of the target trajectories and, for each eye, the effective number of tracked trajectories was estimated. This number increased systematically with increasing magnitude of deviation of the targets. On average, the effective numbers of tracked trajectories were approximately 15% smaller for the amblyopic eyes for each of the three magnitudes of deviation. A comparison with data previously published for normal eyes failed to reveal any deficit in the effective number of trajectories tracked by the non-amblyopic eyes of amblyopic observers for the current task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18484847     DOI: 10.1167/8.4.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  Impaired visual decision-making in individuals with amblyopia.

Authors:  Faraz Farzin; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Acuity-independent effects of visual deprivation on human visual cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Temporal frequency discrimination in amblyopia.

Authors:  Xubo Yang; Jihong Zeng; Jianglan Wang; Longqian Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Attention deficits in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Suzanne P McKee; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-03-22

6.  Endogenous attention improves perception in amblyopic macaques.

Authors:  Amelie Pham; Marisa Carrasco; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Sensitivity to biological motion drops by approximately 1/2 log-unit with inversion, and is unaffected by amblyopia.

Authors:  Peter Neri; Jennifer Y Luu; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Misperceptions in the trajectories of objects undergoing curvilinear motion.

Authors:  Ozgur Yilmaz; Srimant P Tripathy; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Feature Counting Is Impaired When Shifting Attention Between the Eyes in Adults With Amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Gabriela Acevedo Munares
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Degraded attentional modulation of cortical neural populations in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Yee-Joon Kim; Xin Jie Lai; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.