Literature DB >> 17367775

Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: when adults learn new words.

Laura Leach1, Arthur G Samuel.   

Abstract

People know thousands of words in their native language, and each of these words must be learned at some time in the person's lifetime. A large number of these words will be learned when the person is an adult, reflecting the fact that the mental lexicon is continuously changing. We explore how new words get added to the mental lexicon, and provide empirical support for a theoretical distinction between what we call lexical configuration and lexical engagement. Lexical configuration is the set of factual knowledge associated with a word (e.g., the word's sound, spelling, meaning, or syntactic role). Almost all previous research on word learning has focused on this aspect. However, it is also critical to understand the process by which a word becomes capable of lexical engagement--the ways in which a lexical entry dynamically interacts with other lexical entries, and with sublexical representations. For example, lexical entries compete with each other during word recognition (inhibition within the lexical level), and they also support the activation of their constituents (top-down lexical-phonemic facilitation, and lexically-based perceptual learning). We systematically vary the learning conditions for new words, and use separate measures of lexical configuration and engagement. Several surprising dissociations in behavior demonstrate the importance of the theoretical distinction between configuration and engagement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17367775      PMCID: PMC2134982          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  Space aliens and nonwords: stimuli for investigating the learning of novel word-meaning pairs.

Authors:  Prahlad Gupta; John Lipinski; Brandon Abbs; Po-Han Lin; Emrah Aktunc; David Ludden; Nadine Martin; Rochelle Newman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-11

2.  Word length and lexical activation: longer is better.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants.

Authors:  J R Saffran; R N Aslin; E L Newport
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Red herring detectors and speech perception: in defense of selective adaptation.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Enduring influence of the purpose of experiences: encoding-retrieval interactions in word and pseudoword perception.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; A L Cantwell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-11

7.  Perceptual learning for speech: Is there a return to normal?

Authors:  Tanya Kraljic; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1981-12

9.  The role of bottom-up confirmation in the phonemic restoration illusion.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  63 in total

1.  Lexical characteristics of expressive vocabulary in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Sara T Kover; Susan Ellis Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Online learning from input versus offline memory evolution in adult word learning: effects of neighborhood density and phonologically related practice.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Daniel E Bontempo; Natalie S Pak
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effect of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word-learning configuration by preschoolers with typical development and specific language impairment.

Authors:  Shelley Gray; Andrea Pittman; Juliet Weinhold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Novel Word Learning in Children Who Are Bilingual: Comparison to Monolingual Peers.

Authors:  Mary Alt; Genesis Dominique Arizmendi; Shelley Gray; Tiffany Patrice Hogan; Samuel Green; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Word learning and the cerebral hemispheres: from serial to parallel processing of written words.

Authors:  Andrew W Ellis; Roberto Ferreira; Polly Cathles-Hagan; Kathryn Holt; Lisa Jarvis; Laura Barca
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Monolingual and Bilingual Word Recognition and Word Learning in Background Noise.

Authors:  Giovanna Morini; Rochelle S Newman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2019-05-19       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Consolidation of novel word learning in native English-speaking adults.

Authors:  Laura B F Kurdziel; Rebecca M C Spencer
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2015-03-13

8.  Word learning by children with phonological delays: differentiating effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel; Jill R Hoover
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Nonwords and generalization in children with phonological disorders.

Authors:  Judith A Gierut; Michele L Morrisette; Suzanne M Ziemer
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  A complementary systems account of word learning: neural and behavioural evidence.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; M Gareth Gaskell
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.