Literature DB >> 17002526

Word length and lexical activation: longer is better.

Mark A Pitt1, Arthur G Samuel.   

Abstract

Many models of spoken word recognition posit the existence of lexical and sublexical representations, with excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms used to affect the activation levels of such representations. Bottom-up evidence provides excitatory input, and inhibition from phonetically similar representations leads to lexical competition. In such a system, long words should produce stronger lexical activation than short words, for 2 reasons: Long words provide more bottom-up evidence than short words, and short words are subject to greater inhibition due to the existence of more similar words. Four experiments provide evidence for this view. In addition, reaction-time-based partitioning of the data shows that long words generate greater activation that is available both earlier and for a longer time than is the case for short words. As a result, lexical influences on phoneme identification are extremely robust for long words but are quite fragile and condition-dependent for short words. Models of word recognition must consider words of all lengths to capture the true dynamics of lexical activation. Copyright 2006 APA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17002526     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  Context effects on musical chord categorization: Different forms of top-down feedback in speech and music?

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Joel L Dennhardt; Andrew Struck-Marcell
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-07

2.  Orthographic influences in spoken word recognition: the consistency effect in semantic and gender categorization tasks.

Authors:  Ronald Peereman; Sophie Dufour; Jennifer S Burt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

3.  The Role of Secondary-Stressed and Unstressed-Unreduced Syllables in Word Recognition: Acoustic and Perceptual Studies with Russian Learners of English.

Authors:  Elina Banzina; Laura C Dilley; Lynne E Hewitt
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-08

4.  The Activation of Embedded Words in Spoken Word Recognition.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015 February-April       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Phoneme restoration and empirical coverage of interactive activation and adaptive resonance models of human speech processing.

Authors:  James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Downside of Greater Lexical Influences: Selectively Poorer Speech Perception in Noise.

Authors:  Boji P W Lam; Zilong Xie; Rachel Tessmer; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Visibility of speech articulation enhances auditory phonetic convergence.

Authors:  James W Dias; Lawrence D Rosenblum
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Pattern Perception in Quiet and at Different Signal to Noise Ratio in Children with Learning Disability.

Authors:  Kumari Apeksha; Bindhu Hyakanuru Mahadevaswamy; Sahana Mahadev; Moulya Thamadehalli Shivananda
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.017

10.  An electrophysiological megastudy of spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Kurt Winsler; Katherine J Midgley; Jonathan Grainger; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.