Literature DB >> 17360252

Fractal rotation isolates mechanisms for form-dependent motion in human vision.

Christopher P Benton1, Justin M D O'Brien, W Curran.   

Abstract

Here, we describe a motion stimulus in which the quality of rotation is fractal. This makes its motion unavailable to the translation-based motion analysis known to underlie much of our motion perception. In contrast, normal rotation can be extracted through the aggregation of the outputs of translational mechanisms. Neural adaptation of these translation-based motion mechanisms is thought to drive the motion after-effect, a phenomenon in which prolonged viewing of motion in one direction leads to a percept of motion in the opposite direction. We measured the motion after-effects induced in static and moving stimuli by fractal rotation. The after-effects found were an order of magnitude smaller than those elicited by normal rotation. Our findings suggest that the analysis of fractal rotation involves different neural processes than those for standard translational motion. Given that the percept of motion elicited by fractal rotation is a clear example of motion derived from form analysis, we propose that the extraction of fractal rotation may reflect the operation of a general mechanism for inferring motion from changes in form.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17360252      PMCID: PMC2464696          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

1.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

Review 2.  Fundamental mechanisms of visual motion detection: models, cells and functions.

Authors:  C W G Clifford; M R Ibbotson
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  A motion illusion generated by afternystagmus suppression.

Authors:  A Chaudhuri
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1990-10-02       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Viewpoint dependence in adaptation to facial identity.

Authors:  Christopher P Benton; Sarah J Jennings; David J Chatting
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Motion analysis by feature tracking.

Authors:  M M Del Viva; M C Morrone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The perception of apparent movement.

Authors:  S M Anstis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception.

Authors:  Z L Lu; G Sperling
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Visual motion perception.

Authors:  T D Albright; G R Stoner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Perceiving visual expansion without optic flow.

Authors:  P R Schrater; D C Knill; E P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  A common framework for the analysis of complex motion? Standstill and capture illusions.

Authors:  Max R Dürsteler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Orientation-defined visual rotation significantly affects observer's perceived self-motion.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Performance characterization of Watson Ahumada motion detector using random dot rotary motion stimuli.

Authors:  Siddharth Jain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Feature tracking and aging.

Authors:  Rémy Allard; Sarah Lagacé-Nadon; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.