Literature DB >> 7708660

Visual motion perception.

T D Albright1, G R Stoner.   

Abstract

The primate visual motion system performs numerous functions essential for survival in a dynamic visual world. Prominent among these functions is the ability to recover and represent the trajectories of objects in a form that facilitates behavioral responses to those movements. The first step toward this goal, which consists of detecting the displacement of retinal image features, has been studied for many years in both psychophysical and neurobiological experiments. Evidence indicates that achievement of this step is computationally straightforward and occurs at the earliest cortical stage. The second step involves the selective integration of retinal motion signals according to the object of origin. Realization of this step is computationally demanding, as the solution is formally underconstrained. It must rely--by definition--upon utilization of retinal cues that are indicative of the spatial relationships within and between objects in the visual scene. Psychophysical experiments have documented this dependence and suggested mechanisms by which it may be achieved. Neurophysiological experiments have provided evidence for a neural substrate that may underlie this selective motion signal integration. Together they paint a coherent portrait of the means by which retinal image motion gives rise to our perceptual experience of moving objects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7708660      PMCID: PMC42232          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  52 in total

1.  A short-range process in apparent motion.

Authors:  O Braddick
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Optical velocity patterns, velocity-sensitive neurons, and space perception: a hypothesis.

Authors:  K Nakayama; J M Loomis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Apparent movement with subjective contours.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; V M Rao; T R Vidyasagar
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Differences between monocular and binocular stroboscopic movement perception.

Authors:  B Julesz; R A Payne
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields.

Authors:  P H Schiller; B L Finlay; S F Volman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Evidence for separate motion-detecting mechanisms for first- and second-order motion in human vision.

Authors:  T Ledgeway; A T Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  S M Zeki
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Response properties and receptive fields of cells in an anatomically defined region of the superior temporal sulcus in the monkey.

Authors:  R Dubner; S M Zeki
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  A representation of the visual field in the caudal third of the middle tempral gyrus of the owl monkey (Aotus trivirgatus).

Authors:  J M Allman; J H Kaas
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-08-07       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  30 in total

1.  Activity patterns in human motion-sensitive areas depend on the interpretation of global motion.

Authors:  Miguel Castelo-Branco; Elia Formisano; Walter Backes; Friedhelm Zanella; Sergio Neuenschwander; Wolf Singer; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chromatic sensitivity of neurones in area MT of the anaesthetised macaque monkey compared to human motion perception.

Authors:  Igor Riecanský; Alexander Thiele; Claudia Distler; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Detection of speed changes during pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Thomas Haarmeier; Peter Thier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Pivotal role of hMT+ in long-range disambiguation of interhemispheric bistable surface motion.

Authors:  João Valente Duarte; Gabriel Nascimento Costa; Ricardo Martins; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Suppressive mechanisms in visual motion processing: From perception to intelligence.

Authors:  Duje Tadin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Phantoms in the brain: ambiguous representations of stimulus amplitude and timing in weakly electric fish.

Authors:  Bruce A Carlson
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2008-11-01

7.  Peeling plaids apart: context counteracts cross-orientation contrast masking.

Authors:  Elliot Freeman; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Global Visual Motion Sensitivity: Associations with Parietal Area and Children's Mathematical Cognition.

Authors:  Oliver Braddick; Janette Atkinson; Erik Newman; Natacha Akshoomoff; Joshua M Kuperman; Hauke Bartsch; Chi-Hua Chen; Anders M Dale; Terry L Jernigan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Altered connectivity of the balance processing network after tongue stimulation in balance-impaired individuals.

Authors:  Joe C Wildenberg; Mitchell E Tyler; Yuri P Danilov; Kurt A Kaczmarek; Mary E Meyerand
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013

10.  Functional and anatomical profile of visual motion impairments in stroke patients correlate with fMRI in normal subjects.

Authors:  Lucia M Vaina; Elif M Sikoglu; Sergei Soloviev; Marjorie LeMay; Salvatore Squatrito; Gabriella Pandiani; Alan Cowey
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.