Literature DB >> 18209744

Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension.

Julie A Van Dyke1, Brian McElree.   

Abstract

The role of interference effects in sentence processing has recently begun to receive attention, however whether these effects arise during encoding or retrieval remains unclear. This paper draws on basic memory research to help distinguish these explanations and reports data from an experiment that manipulates the possibility for retrieval interference while holding encoding conditions constant. We found clear support for the principle of cue-overload, wherein cues available at retrieval cannot uniquely distinguish among competitors, thus giving rise to interference effects. We discuss the data in relation to a cue-based parsing framework (Van Dyke & Lewis, 2003) and other interference effects observed in sentence processing (e.g., Gordon, Hendrick, & Johnson, 2001, 2004). We conclude from the available data that the memory system that subserves language comprehension operates according to similar principles as memory in other domains.

Year:  2006        PMID: 18209744      PMCID: PMC2206541          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  16 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures.

Authors:  B McElree
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

3.  Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; William H Levine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

4.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-09

Review 5.  A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

Review 7.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  E Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1998-08

8.  Cuing effects in short-term recall.

Authors:  G Tehan; M S Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-11

9.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.

Authors:  G Gillund; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Interference in short-term memory: the magical number two (or three) in sentence processing.

Authors:  R L Lewis
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-01
View more
  80 in total

1.  Comparisons of online reading paradigms: eye tracking, moving-window, and maze.

Authors:  Naoko Witzel; Jeffrey Witzel; Kenneth Forster
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-04

2.  Memory Interference as a Determinant of Language Comprehension.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke; Clinton L Johns
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2012-03-12

3.  Structural Relationship Between Cognitive Processing and Syntactic Sentence Comprehension in Children With and Without Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  James W Montgomery; Julia L Evans; Jamison D Fargo; Sarah Schwartz; Ronald B Gillam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Richard L Lewis; Shravan Vasishth; Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: Evidence from eye tracking during reading.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; Marcus Johnson; Yoonhyoung Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The effect of object state-changes on event processing: do objects compete with themselves?

Authors:  Nicholas C Hindy; Gerry T M Altmann; Emily Kalenik; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Animacy and competition in relative clause production: a cross-linguistic investigation.

Authors:  Silvia P Gennari; Jelena Mirković; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pushed aside: Parentheticals, Memory and Processing.

Authors:  Brian Dillon; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  The source ambiguity problem: Distinguishing the effects of grammar and processing on acceptability judgments.

Authors:  Philip Hofmeister; T Florian Jaeger; Inbal Arnon; Ivan A Sag; Neal Snider
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.