Literature DB >> 11062325

Reading time evidence for enriched composition.

B McElree1, M J Traxler, M J Pickering, R E Seely, R Jackendoff.   

Abstract

Verbs like 'begin' and 'enjoy' appear to semantically select a complement that expresses an activity or an event (Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; Pustejovsky, J. Cognition 41 (1991) 47; Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). When these verbs occur with a complement that does not directly denote either an activity or an event (e.g. '... began the book' or '... enjoyed the book'), the complement must be type-shifted from an object to an activity to conform to the verb's semantic restrictions. We report an experiment in which self-paced reading times were found to be longer for complements that required type-shifting than for complements that directly matched the semantic restrictions of the matrix verb. This finding is argued to provide on-line evidence for a type of enriched lexical processing posited in recent lexical semantic research.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11062325     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00113-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  19 in total

1.  Word category conversion causes processing costs: evidence from adjectival passives.

Authors:  Britta Stolterfoht; Helga Gese; Claudia Maienborn
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

2.  A time course analysis of enriched composition.

Authors:  Brian McElree; Liina Pylkkänen; Martin J Pickering; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

3.  Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.

Authors:  Julie A Van Dyke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Meanings, propositions, and verbs.

Authors:  Gail McKoon; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

5.  Complement Coercion: Distinguishing Between Type-Shifting and Pragmatic Inferencing.

Authors:  Argyro Katsika; David Braze; Ashwini Deo; Maria Mercedes Piñango
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2012

6.  Implementing a concept network model.

Authors:  Sarah H Solomon; John D Medaglia; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2019-08

7.  Complement Coercion in Mandarin Chinese: Evidence from a Self-paced Reading Study.

Authors:  Wenting Xue; Meichun Liu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2020-11-18

8.  Eye-Tracking and Corpus-Based Analyses of Syntax-Semantics Interactions in Complement Coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Peter C Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Arim Choi; Neil Cohn; Martin Paczynski; Ray Jackendoff
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.