Literature DB >> 17352616

Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost.

Frederick Verbruggen1, Baptist Liefooghe, André Vandierendonck, Jelle Demanet.   

Abstract

In the task-switching literature, it has frequently been demonstrated that although advance task preparation reduces the switch cost, it never really eliminates the switch cost. This remaining residual switch cost received much attention, and it has been argued that advance preparation is restricted in nature. In the present study, the role of task-cue presentation in the establishment of the residual switch cost was investigated. In 4 experiments, the cue was removed during the preparation interval, and it was hypothesized that this would encourage participants to complete advance task preparation. The results of all 4 experiments provided support for this hypothesis: When the cue was presented for a short time and then removed, the residual switch cost completely disappeared. This was found for different cue types. Furthermore, Experiment 3 demonstrated that it was not the presence of the cue itself but merely differences in advance task preparation that caused the effects. This suggests that advance task preparation is not as restricted in nature as previously assumed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17352616     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  15 in total

Review 1.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: reviewing a decade of fMRI research.

Authors:  Hannes Ruge; Sharna Jamadar; Uta Zimmermann; Frini Karayanidis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.

Authors:  Darryl W Schneider
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

3.  Task switching based on externally presented versus internally generated information.

Authors:  Thomas Kleinsorge; Patrick D Gajewski
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-02-27

4.  Influence of display type and cue format on task-cuing effects: dissociating switch cost and right-left prevalence effects.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Iring Koch; Kim-Phuong L Vu; Motonori Yamaguchi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-07

5.  A brain-potential study of preparation for and execution of a task-switch with stimuli that afford only the relevant task.

Authors:  Heike Elchlepp; Aureliu Lavric; Guy A Mizon; Stephen Monsell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Automaticity without extensive training: the role of memory retrieval in implementation of task-defined rules.

Authors:  Motonori Yamaguchi; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

7.  Covert judgements are sufficient to trigger subsequent task-switching costs.

Authors:  Rachel Swainson; Douglas Martin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-12

8.  Speaking Two Languages for the Price of One: Bypassing Language Control Mechanisms via Accessibility-Driven Switches.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-03-25

9.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Applying an attentional set to perceived and remembered features.

Authors:  Duncan Edward Astle; Anna Christina Nobre; Gaia Scerif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.