Literature DB >> 22886404

Covert judgements are sufficient to trigger subsequent task-switching costs.

Rachel Swainson1, Douglas Martin.   

Abstract

This research examines whether we have a tendency to repeat mental processes leading to decisions or judgements that are not accompanied by overt behaviours. We adapted the task-switching paradigm so that on selected trials task processing would be terminated prior to response execution. Switch costs were present subsequent to trials where task processing was terminated either at the stage of response selection or at the earlier stage of making a covert judgement (a mental decision) about the target stimulus. These costs were residual, as they occurred despite long preparation intervals, and they did not result from cue-switching or feature-repetition effects. We conclude that the same type of control mechanism may be recruited to select between potential alternative tasks whenever a stimulus needs to be processed in a task-specific way, regardless of whether or not an overt response is required.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886404     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0448-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  20 in total

1.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition.

Authors:  U Mayr; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-03

2.  Decomposing components of task preparation with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Marcel Brass; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The preparation effect in task switching: carryover of SOA.

Authors:  Erik M Altmann
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

4.  How to correct a task error: Task-switch effects following different types of error correction.

Authors:  Marco Steinhauser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Response selection difficulty and asymmetrical costs of switching between tasks and stimuli: no evidence for an exogenous component of task-set reconfiguration.

Authors:  Mike Hübner; Rainer H Kluwe; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Alexandra Peters
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Selective stopping in task switching: The role of response selection and response execution.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Baptist Liefooghe; André Vandierendonck
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

7.  Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Andrea M Philipp; Pierre Jolicoeur; Michael Falkenstein; Iring Koch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Two measures of task-specific inhibition.

Authors:  Duncan E Astle; Georgina M Jackson; Rachel Swainson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching.

Authors:  M H Sohn; S Ursu; J R Anderson; V A Stenger; C S Carter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  No-go trials can modulate switch cost by interfering with effects of task preparation.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Nick Yeung; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of performing versus preparing a task on the subsequent switch cost.

Authors:  Rachel Swainson; Laura Prosser; Kostadin Karavasilev; Aleksandra Romanczuk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.