Literature DB >> 17348524

Physiological detection of interaural phase differences.

Bernhard Ross1, Kelly L Tremblay, Terence W Picton.   

Abstract

Auditory evoked cortical responses to changes in the interaural phase difference (IPD) were recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Twelve normal-hearing young adults were tested with amplitude-modulated tones with carrier frequencies of 500, 1000, 1250, and 1500 Hz. The onset of the stimuli evoked P1m-N1m-P2m cortical responses, as did the changes in the interaural phase. Significant responses to IPD changes were identified at 500 and 1000 Hz in all subjects and at 1250 Hz in nine subjects, whereas responses were absent in all subjects at 1500 Hz, indicating a group mean threshold for detecting IPDs of 1250 Hz. Behavioral thresholds were found at 1200 Hz using an adaptive two alternative forced choice procedure. Because the physiological responses require phase information, through synchronous bilateral inputs at the level of the auditory brainstem, physiological "change" detection thresholds likely reflect the upper limit of phase synchronous activity in the brainstem. The procedure has potential applications in investigating impaired binaural processing because phase statistic applied to single epoch MEG data allowed individual thresholds to be obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17348524     DOI: 10.1121/1.2404915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Auditory temporal edge detection in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria Chait; David Poeppel; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Christopher G Clinard; Seeyoun Kwon; Vasant K Dasika; Kaibao Nie; Ward R Drennan; Kelly L Tremblay; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-27

3.  Stimulus presentation strategies for eliciting the acoustic change complex: increasing efficiency.

Authors:  Brett A Martin; Arthur Boothroyd; Dassan Ali; Tiffany Leach-Berth
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in (Un)aided Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Adults.

Authors:  Bram Van Dun; Anna Kania; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

5.  Comparison of two cortical measures of binaural hearing acuity.

Authors:  Won So; Spencer B Smith
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  David A Magezi; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Perceptual sensitivity to, and electrophysiological encoding of, a complex periodic signal: effects of age.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  The effect of changes in stimulus level on electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials.

Authors:  Jae-Ryong Kim; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas; Christine P Etler; Sara O'Brien
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Speech-evoked ABR: Effects of age and simulated neural temporal jitter.

Authors:  Sara K Mamo; John H Grose; Emily Buss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Antoine J Shahin; Terence Picton; Bernhard Ross
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.