Literature DB >> 17346969

Metacognition in the rat.

Allison L Foote1, Jonathon D Crystal.   

Abstract

The ability to reflect on one's own mental processes, termed metacognition, is a defining feature of human existence [1, 2]. Consequently, a fundamental question in comparative cognition is whether nonhuman animals have knowledge of their own cognitive states [3]. Recent evidence suggests that people and nonhuman primates [4-8] but not less "cognitively sophisticated" species [3, 9, 10] are capable of metacognition. Here, we demonstrate for the first time that rats are capable of metacognition--i.e., they know when they do not know the answer in a duration-discrimination test. Before taking the duration test, rats were given the opportunity to decline the test. On other trials, they were not given the option to decline the test. Accurate performance on the duration test yielded a large reward, whereas inaccurate performance resulted in no reward. Declining a test yielded a small but guaranteed reward. If rats possess knowledge regarding whether they know the answer to the test, they would be expected to decline most frequently on difficult tests and show lowest accuracy on difficult tests that cannot be declined [4]. Our data provide evidence for both predictions and suggest that a nonprimate has knowledge of its own cognitive state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17346969      PMCID: PMC1861845          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) immediately generalize the uncertain response.

Authors:  David A Washburn; J David Smith; Wendy E Shields
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2006-04

2.  Response bias and the discrimination of stimulus duration.

Authors:  D A Stubbs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Systematic nonlinearities in the perception of temporal intervals.

Authors:  J D Crystal
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1999-01

4.  The uncertain response in humans and animals.

Authors:  J D Smith; W E Shields; J Schull; D A Washburn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-01

5.  Long-interval timing is based on a self-sustaining endogenous oscillator.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 1.777

Review 6.  Can animals recall the past and plan for the future?

Authors:  Nicola S Clayton; Timothy J Bussey; Anthony Dickinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Memory monitoring by animals and humans.

Authors:  J D Smith; W E Shields; K R Allendoerfer; D A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-09

8.  The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition.

Authors:  J David Smith; Wendy E Shields; David A Washburn
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  Uncertainty in pigeons.

Authors:  Leslie M Sole; Sara J Shettleworth; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

10.  Food-caching western scrub-jays keep track of who was watching when.

Authors:  Joanna M Dally; Nathan J Emery; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  73 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Evaluation of seven hypotheses for metamemory performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Gabriel R Schroeder; Emily Kathryn Brown; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 3.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Metacognition in monkeys during an oculomotor task.

Authors:  Paul G Middlebrooks; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  The behavioral economics of choice and interval timing.

Authors:  J Jozefowiez; J E R Staddon; D T Cerutti
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.

Authors:  Allison Adams; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Infants ask for help when they know they don't know.

Authors:  Louise Goupil; Margaux Romand-Monnier; Sid Kouider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) adaptively adjust information seeking in response to information accumulated.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Alex A Pani; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.231

10.  Metamemory as evidence of animal consciousness: the type that does the trick.

Authors:  Nicholas Shea; Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Biol Philos       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 1.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.