Literature DB >> 8997171

The uncertain response in humans and animals.

J D Smith1, W E Shields, J Schull, D A Washburn.   

Abstract

There has been no comparative psychological study of uncertainty processes. Accordingly, the present experiments asked whether animals, like humans, escape adaptively when they are uncertain. Human and animal observers were given two primary responses in a visual discrimination task, and the opportunity to escape from some trials into easier ones. In one psychophysical task (using a threshold paradigm), humans escaped selectively the difficult trials that left them uncertain of the stimulus. Two rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) also showed this pattern. In a second psychophysical task (using the method of constant stimuli), some humans showed this pattern but one escaped infrequently and nonoptimally. Monkeys showed equivalent individual differences. The data suggest that escapes by humans and monkeys are interesting cognitive analogs and may reflect controlled decisional processes prompted by the perceptual ambiguity at threshold.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Space Human Factors; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 8997171     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00726-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  33 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

Review 2.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  I scan, therefore I decline: The time course of difficulty monitoring in humans (homo sapiens) and macaques (macaca mulatta).

Authors:  J David Smith; Joseph Boomer; Barbara A Church; Alexandria C Zakrzewski; Michael J Beran; Michael L Baum
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  The behavioral economics of choice and interval timing.

Authors:  J Jozefowiez; J E R Staddon; D T Cerutti
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Pigeons exhibit higher accuracy for chosen memory tests than for forced memory tests in duration matching-to-sample.

Authors:  Allison Adams; Angelo Santi
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Information-integration category learning and the human uncertainty response.

Authors:  Erick J Paul; Joseph Boomer; J David Smith; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

7.  Visuospatial selective attention in chickens.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Deepa L Ramamurthy; Jason S Schwarz; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Go when you know: Chimpanzees' confidence movements reflect their responses in a computerized memory task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; Sara E Futch; J David Smith; Theodore A Evans; Audrey E Parrish
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-06-06

9.  Supplementary Eye Field Encodes Confidence in Decisions Under Risk.

Authors:  NaYoung So; Veit Stuphorn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Evidence of metacognitive control by humans and monkeys in a perceptual categorization task.

Authors:  Joshua S Redford
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.