Literature DB >> 14620372

Uncertainty in pigeons.

Leslie M Sole1, Sara J Shettleworth, Patrick J Bennett.   

Abstract

Pigeons classified a display of illuminated pixels on a touchscreen as sparse or dense. Correct responses were reinforced with six food pellets; incorrect responses were unreinforced. On some trials an uncertain response option was available. Pecking it was always reinforced with an intermediate number of pellets. Like monkeys and people in related experiments, the birds chose the uncertain response most often when the stimulus presented was difficult to classify correctly, but in other respects their behavior was not functionally similar to human behavior based on conscious uncertainty or to the behavior of monkeys in comparable experiments. Our data were well described by a signal detection model that assumed that the birds were maximizing perceived reward in a consistent way across all the experimental conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14620372     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Decision theory, the pigeon, and the psychophysical function.

Authors:  C A Boneau; J L Cole
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Visual detection in monkeys with blindsight.

Authors:  A Cowey; P Stoerig
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Photopic spectral sensitivity determined electroretinographically for the pigeon eye.

Authors:  P M Blough; L A Riggs; K L Schafer
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Starlings' preferences for predictable and unpredictable delays to food.

Authors:  M Bateson; A Kacelnik
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Uncertain responses by humans and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) in a psychophysical same-different task.

Authors:  W E Shields; J D Smith; D A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

6.  Stimulus generalization as signal detection in pigeons.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-11-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The uncertain response in humans and animals.

Authors:  J D Smith; W E Shields; J Schull; D A Washburn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1997-01

8.  Analysis of cognitive function in animals, the value of SDT.

Authors:  H M Marston
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1996-06

9.  Memory monitoring by animals and humans.

Authors:  J D Smith; W E Shields; K R Allendoerfer; D A Washburn
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1998-09

10.  What young chimpanzees know about seeing.

Authors:  D J Povinelli; T J Eddy
Journal:  Monogr Soc Res Child Dev       Date:  1996
View more
  12 in total

1.  What are my chances? Closing the gap in uncertainty monitoring between rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Bonnie M Perdue; J David Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.478

2.  Evaluation of seven hypotheses for metamemory performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Gabriel R Schroeder; Emily Kathryn Brown; Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-11-03

Review 3.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The misbehaviour of a metacognitive monkey.

Authors:  Ken Sayers; Theodore A Evans; Emilie Menzel; J David Smith; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.991

5.  Predicting behavioural responses to novel organisms: state-dependent detection theory.

Authors:  Pete C Trimmer; Sean M Ehlman; Andrew Sih
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) show robust evidence for memory awareness across multiple generalization tests.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.084

7.  "Play it Again": a new method for testing metacognition in animals.

Authors:  Allison L Foote; Jonathon D Crystal
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-09-11       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Mammalian choices: combining fast-but-inaccurate and slow-but-accurate decision-making systems.

Authors:  Pete C Trimmer; Alasdair I Houston; James A R Marshall; Rafal Bogacz; Elizabeth S Paul; Mike T Mendl; John M McNamara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Multiple demonstrations of metacognition in nonhumans: Converging evidence or multiple mechanisms?

Authors:  Robert R Hampton
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009-01-01

10.  An assessment of memory awareness in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Benjamin M Basile; Robert R Hampton; Stephen J Suomi; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.