Literature DB >> 11074078

Neurophysiological interpretation of human visual reaction times: effect of contrast, spatial frequency and luminance.

S Plainis1, I J Murray.   

Abstract

Neurophysiological studies have demonstrated that in primates Magno and Parvo neurons have distinct contrast gain properties. Reaction Times (RTs) can be used to study supra-threshold contrast coding in humans over the same range of stimulus parameters. RTs to achromatic sinusoidal gratings were measured for a range of spatial frequencies (0.49-17.7 c/degree), stimulus luminances (0.005-20 cd/m2) and contrasts (from threshold to 0.5). The stimuli subtended an angle of 7.2 degrees at a viewing distance of 114 cm. RTs exhibit a linear relationship when plotted against the reciprocal of suprathreshold contrast. The slope of these functions reveals how contrast is linked to RT and can, therefore, be referred to as the RT-contrast factor with units of msec x contrast. A general equation is derived which accounts for all stimulus combinations. RT-based contrast functions resemble closely those obtained neurophysiologically for Magno (M) and Parvo (P) cells. Furthermore, the RT equivalent of contrast gain exhibits qualitatively similar gain characteristics to these neurons for a wide range of luminances and spatial frequencies. Our data support the notion that the sensory component of RTs is limited by the properties of pre-cortical neurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11074078     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00100-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  19 in total

1.  Perceptual requirements for fast manual responses.

Authors:  Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Assessing the effects of physical and perceived luminance contrast on RT and TMS-induced percepts.

Authors:  Ramisha Knight; Chiara Mazzi; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A noisy transform predicts saccadic and manual reaction times to changes in contrast.

Authors:  M J Taylor; R H S Carpenter; A J Anderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Threshold units: a correct metric for reaction time?

Authors:  Andrew J Zele; Dingcai Cao; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Linking impulse response functions to reaction time: rod and cone reaction time data and a computational model.

Authors:  Dingcai Cao; Andrew J Zele; Joel Pokorny
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Visual discomfort from flicker: Effects of mean light level and contrast.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Fang Jiang; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Arnold J Wilkins; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  A simple two-stage model predicts response time distributions.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter; B A J Reddi; A J Anderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Glaucomatous retinal nerve fiber layer thickness loss is associated with slower reaction times under a divided attention task.

Authors:  Andrew J Tatham; Erwin R Boer; Peter N Rosen; Mauro Della Penna; Daniel Meira-Freitas; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Sound-driven enhancement of vision: disentangling detection-level from decision-level contributions.

Authors:  Alexis Pérez-Bellido; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.