Literature DB >> 17346400

Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The case for open radical prostatectomy.

Nadeem Shaida1, Peter R Malone.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17346400      PMCID: PMC2018857          DOI: 10.1308/003588407X168343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


× No keyword cloud information.
  23 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the initial UK series.

Authors:  C G Eden; D Cahill; J A Vass; T H Adams; M I Dauleh
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Urinary continence and erectile function: a prospective evaluation of functional results after radical laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Ran Katz; Alexandre De La Taille; Fabien Saint; Dimitrios Vordos; Anthony Cicco; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clement-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Cost comparison of laparoscopic versus radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Kyle Anderson; Adam Murdock; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

Review 5.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of comparative studies.

Authors:  Rebecca Tooher; Peter Swindle; Henry Woo; John Miller; Guy Maddern
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Radical prostatectomy: pathology findings in 1001 cases compared with other major series and over time.

Authors:  Simon R J Bott; A Alex Freeman; Sally Stenning; Jonathan Cohen; M Constance Parkinson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies.

Authors:  W J Catalona; G F Carvalhal; D E Mager; D S Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Changes in quality of life in first year after radical prostatectomy by retropubic, laparoscopic, and perineal approach: Multi-institutional longitudinal study in Japan.

Authors:  Shunichi Namiki; Shin Egawa; Toshiro Terachi; Akio Matsubara; Mikio Igawa; Akito Terai; Tatsuo Tochigi; Naomasa Ioritani; Seiichi Saito; Yoichi Arai
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Nadu; L Salomon; A Hoznek; L E Olsson; F Saint; A de La Taille; A Cicco; D Chopin; C C Abbou
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rupa Patel; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  1 in total

1.  A core outcome set for localised prostate cancer effectiveness trials: protocol for a systematic review of the literature and stakeholder involvement through interviews and a Delphi survey.

Authors:  Steven MacLennan; Hendrika J Bekema; Paula R Williamson; Marion K Campbell; Fiona Stewart; Sara J MacLennan; James M O N'Dow; Thomas B L Lam
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.